• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时能相信应答者?使用 50%应答率评估临床试验时存在严重关切。

When can we trust responders? Serious concerns when using 50% response rate to assess clinical trials.

机构信息

Graeme Clark Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2019 Sep;60(9):e99-e103. doi: 10.1111/epi.16321. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1111/epi.16321
PMID:31471901
Abstract

Individual seizure rates are highly volatile, with large fluctuations from month-to-month. Nevertheless, changes in individual mean seizure rates are used to measure whether or not trial participants successfully respond to treatment. This study aims to quantify the challenges in identifying individual treatment responders in epilepsy. A power calculation was performed to determine the trial duration required to detect a significant 50% decrease in seizure rates (P < .05) for individuals. Seizure rate simulations were also performed to determine the number of people who would appear to be 50% responders by chance. Seizure rate statistics were derived from long-term seizure counts recorded during a previous clinical trial for an implantable seizure monitoring device. We showed that individual variance in monthly seizure rates can lead to an unacceptably high false-positive rate in the detection of individual treatment responders. This error rate cannot be reduced by increasing the trial population; however, it can be reduced by increasing the duration of clinical trials. This finding suggests that some drugs may be incorrectly evaluated as effective; or, conversely, that helpful drugs could be rejected based on 50% response rates. It is important to pursue more nuanced approaches to measuring individual treatment response, which consider the patient-specific distributions of seizure rates.

摘要

个体发作率波动很大,每月都有很大的波动。然而,个体平均发作率的变化被用来衡量试验参与者是否对治疗有成功的反应。本研究旨在量化在癫痫中识别个体治疗反应者的挑战。进行了功效计算,以确定检测发作率显著降低 50%(P<.05)所需的试验持续时间(个体)。还进行了发作率模拟,以确定有多少人会偶然出现 50%的反应者。发作率统计数据来自以前的一项植入式发作监测设备临床试验中记录的长期发作计数。我们表明,每月发作率的个体差异可能导致个体治疗反应者检测中的不可接受的高假阳性率。通过增加试验人群不能降低这种错误率;然而,可以通过增加临床试验的持续时间来降低错误率。这一发现表明,一些药物可能被错误地评估为有效;或者,相反,一些有益的药物可能会因为 50%的反应率而被拒绝。重要的是要寻求更细致的方法来衡量个体治疗反应,这需要考虑发作率的患者特异性分布。

相似文献

1
When can we trust responders? Serious concerns when using 50% response rate to assess clinical trials.何时能相信应答者?使用 50%应答率评估临床试验时存在严重关切。
Epilepsia. 2019 Sep;60(9):e99-e103. doi: 10.1111/epi.16321. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
2
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
3
Long-Term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Cannabidiol in Children with Refractory Epilepsy: Results from an Expanded Access Program in the US.长期安全性、耐受性和疗效的大麻二酚在儿童难治性癫痫:结果从一个扩大获得程序在美国。
CNS Drugs. 2019 Jan;33(1):47-60. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0589-2.
4
Lamotrigine adjunctive therapy among children and adolescents with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.拉莫三嗪辅助治疗儿童和青少年原发性全面性强直阵挛发作。
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e371-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0148. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
5
Comparison of alternative outcome measures for antiepileptic drug trials.抗癫痫药物试验替代结局指标的比较
Arch Neurol. 1986 Sep;43(9):877-81. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520090017009.
6
Monotherapy trials with the new antiepileptic drugs: study designs, practical relevance and ethical implications.新型抗癫痫药物的单药治疗试验:研究设计、实际意义及伦理问题
Epilepsy Res. 1999 Feb;33(2-3):247-62. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(98)00095-3.
7
Time-to-event clinical trial designs: Existing evidence and remaining concerns.时间事件临床试验设计:现有证据和尚存问题。
Epilepsia. 2023 Jul;64(7):1699-1708. doi: 10.1111/epi.17621. Epub 2023 May 2.
8
How reliable is early treatment response in predicting long-term seizure outcome?早期治疗反应在预测长期癫痫发作结果方面的可靠性如何?
Epilepsy Behav. 2007 Jun;10(4):588-94. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.02.011. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
9
Measurement of seizure freedom in adjunctive therapy studies in refractory partial epilepsy: the levetiracetam experience.难治性部分性癫痫辅助治疗研究中癫痫发作缓解的测量:左乙拉西坦的经验
Epileptic Disord. 2006 Jun;8(2):118-30.
10
Antiepileptic drugs for seizure control in people with neurocysticercosis.用于控制神经囊尾蚴病患者癫痫发作的抗癫痫药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 12(10):CD009027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009027.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Blueprint for clinical N-of-1 strategies with off-label precision treatments in monogenic epilepsies.单基因癫痫中应用超说明书精准治疗的临床单病例N-of-1策略蓝图。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jun 16;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03750-z.
2
Does missing medication acutely change seizure risk? A prospective study.漏服药物会急性改变癫痫发作风险吗?一项前瞻性研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 7:2025.06.06.25329144. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.06.25329144.
3
Inductive reasoning with large language models: A simulated randomized controlled trial for epilepsy.
大语言模型的归纳推理:一项癫痫模拟随机对照试验
Epilepsy Res. 2025 Mar;211:107532. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2025.107532. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
4
Exploring the Effectiveness of Adjunctive Cenobamate in Focal Epilepsy: A Time-Based Analysis.探索辅助用司替戊醇治疗局灶性癫痫的有效性:基于时间的分析。
CNS Drugs. 2025 May;39(5):513-523. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01166-8. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
5
The RNS Crystal Ball Sees Seizure Improvement in Your Future With This Medication.RNS 水晶球预示着使用这种药物你的癫痫症状将会改善。
Epilepsy Curr. 2024 Oct 7;24(5):336-338. doi: 10.1177/15357597241279752. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
6
The present and future of seizure detection, prediction, and forecasting with machine learning, including the future impact on clinical trials.利用机器学习进行癫痫发作检测、预测和预报的现状与未来,包括其对临床试验的未来影响。
Front Neurol. 2024 Jul 11;15:1425490. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1425490. eCollection 2024.
7
Demonstration of Group-Level and Individual-Level Efficacy Using Time-to-Event Designs for Clinical Trials of Antiseizure Medications.使用事件时间设计展示抗癫痫药物临床试验的群组水平和个体水平疗效。
Neurology. 2024 Aug 27;103(4):e209713. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209713. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
8
How accurate do self-reported seizures need to be for effective medication management in epilepsy?自我报告的癫痫发作需要达到多高的准确性才能实现有效的癫痫药物管理?
Epilepsia. 2024 Jul;65(7):e104-e112. doi: 10.1111/epi.18019. Epub 2024 May 22.
9
Challenges and directions in epilepsy diagnostics and therapeutics: Proceedings of the 17th Epilepsy Therapies and Diagnostics Development conference.癫痫诊断与治疗中的挑战与方向:第17届癫痫治疗与诊断发展会议论文集
Epilepsia. 2024 Apr;65(4):846-860. doi: 10.1111/epi.17875. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
10
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Applications to Epilepsy: a Review for the Practicing Epileptologist.机器学习与人工智能在癫痫中的应用:给癫痫科执业医师的综述
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Dec;23(12):869-879. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01318-7. Epub 2023 Dec 7.