Eastin Carly, Karim Saleema, Hawthorn Chris, Webb M Hunter, Waheed Mian Adnan, Buford Allen, Hutchison Mack, Mason Chuck, Sexton Kevin
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):527-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
Conflicting ideas exist about whether or not Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel should treat a cardiac arrest on scene or transport immediately.
Our aim was to examine patient outcomes before and after an urban EMS system implemented a protocol change mandating a 30-min scene time interval (STI) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study of OHCA patients before and after an EMS protocol change mandating resuscitation on scene. Data were retrieved from an EMS cardiac arrest database for all adults with non-traumatic OHCA between January 2015 and August 2016. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the study population, and a regression model was used to determine the associations of the protocol with the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
A total of 633 patients were included in the study population, which was primarily male (61.3%) with a mean age of 65 years. After the 30-min STI was implemented, ROSC from OHCA increased to 40.1% of cases compared to 27.3% before the protocol change (p = 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.053-0.203). The STI increased from 19 min 23 s to 29 min 40 s in the pre and post periods, respectively (p < 0.001). Regression indicated that the protocol change was independently associated with an improved chance of ROSC (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.23-2.64).
A protocol change mandating a 30-min STI in OHCA correlated with increased STI and increased ROSC. While increased ROSC may not always equate with positive neurologic outcome, logistic regression indicated that the protocol change was independently associated with improved ROSC at emergency department arrival.
关于紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员应在现场治疗心脏骤停还是立即转运,存在相互矛盾的观点。
我们的目的是研究一个城市EMS系统实施一项协议变更(规定院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的现场时间间隔(STI)为30分钟)前后的患者结局。
这是一项对OHCA患者在EMS协议变更(强制现场复苏)前后进行的回顾性、单中心观察性研究。数据从2015年1月至2016年8月期间所有非创伤性OHCA成年患者的EMS心脏骤停数据库中检索。描述性统计用于总结研究人群,回归模型用于确定该协议与自主循环恢复(ROSC)之间的关联。
研究人群共纳入633例患者,主要为男性(61.3%),平均年龄65岁。实施30分钟STI后,OHCA患者的ROSC发生率增至40.1%,而协议变更前为27.3%(p = 0.001;95%置信区间[CI] 0.053 - 0.203)。STI在变更前后分别从19分23秒增至29分40秒(p < 0.001)。回归分析表明,协议变更与ROSC改善机会独立相关(OR 1.81;95% CI 1.23 - 2.64)。
一项规定OHCA患者30分钟STI的协议变更与STI延长和ROSC增加相关。虽然ROSC增加不一定总是等同于良好的神经学结局,但逻辑回归表明,该协议变更与急诊室到达时ROSC改善独立相关。