Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jan;75(1):84-104. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) are currently willing to consider a 30% to 40% glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline as a surrogate end point for kidney failure for clinical trials of kidney disease progression under appropriate conditions. However, these end points may not be practical for early stages of kidney disease. In March 2018, the National Kidney Foundation sponsored a scientific workshop in collaboration with the FDA and EMA to evaluate changes in albuminuria or GFR as candidate surrogate end points. Three parallel efforts were presented: meta-analyses of observational studies (cohorts), meta-analyses of clinical trials, and simulations of trial design. In cohorts, after accounting for measurement error, relationships between change in urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) or estimated GFR (eGFR) slope and the clinical outcome of kidney disease progression were strong and consistent. In trials, the posterior median R of treatment effects on the candidate surrogates with the clinical outcome was 0.47 (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI], 0.02-0.96) for early change in UACR and 0.72 (95% BCI, 0.05-0.99) when restricted to baseline UACR>30mg/g, and 0.97 (95% BCI, 0.78-1.00) for total eGFR slope at 3 years and 0.96 (95% BCI, 0.63-1.00) for chronic eGFR slope (ie, the slope excluding the first 3 months from baseline, when there might be acute changes in eGFR). The magnitude of the relationships of changes in the candidate surrogates with risk for clinical outcome was consistent across cohorts and trials: a UACR reduction of 30% or eGFR slope reduction by 0.5 to 1.0mL/min/1.73m per year were associated with an HR of ∼0.7 for the clinical outcome in cohorts and trials. In simulations, using GFR slope as an end point substantially reduced the required sample size and duration of follow-up compared with the clinical end point when baseline eGFR was high, treatment effects were uniform, and there was no acute effect of the treatment. We conclude that both early change in albuminuria and GFR slope fulfill criteria for surrogacy for use as end points in clinical trials for chronic kidney disease progression under certain conditions, with stronger support for change in GFR than albuminuria. Implementation requires understanding conditions under which each surrogate is likely to perform well and restricting its use to those settings.
美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)目前愿意考虑肾小球滤过率(GFR)下降 30%至 40%作为替代终点,用于在适当条件下进行肾脏疾病进展的临床试验。然而,这些终点可能不适用于肾脏疾病的早期阶段。2018 年 3 月,美国国家肾脏基金会与 FDA 和 EMA 合作举办了一次科学研讨会,以评估白蛋白尿或 GFR 作为候选替代终点的变化。提出了三项平行的努力:观察性研究(队列)的荟萃分析、临床试验的荟萃分析和试验设计的模拟。在队列中,在考虑到测量误差后,尿白蛋白-肌酐比值(UACR)或估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)斜率变化与肾脏疾病进展的临床结局之间存在强烈且一致的关系。在试验中,候选替代终点与临床结局的治疗效果的后验中位数 R 为 0.47(95%贝叶斯可信区间[BCI],0.02-0.96),早期 UACR 变化时为 0.72(95%BCI,0.05-0.99),当基线 UACR>30mg/g 时限制为 0.97(95%BCI,0.78-1.00),3 年时总 eGFR 斜率为 0.96(95%BCI,0.63-1.00),慢性 eGFR 斜率(即,从基线开始的前 3 个月除外,此时 eGFR 可能发生急性变化)。候选替代终点与临床结局风险之间的变化关系在队列和试验中是一致的:UACR 降低 30%或 eGFR 斜率降低 0.5 至 1.0mL/min/1.73m/年与队列和试验中临床结局的 HR 约为 0.7 相关。在模拟中,与临床终点相比,当基线 GFR 较高、治疗效果均匀且治疗无急性作用时,使用 GFR 斜率作为终点可大大减少所需的样本量和随访时间。我们得出结论,白蛋白尿和 GFR 斜率的早期变化都符合替代终点的标准,可在某些条件下用于慢性肾病进展的临床试验,GFR 变化的支持力度强于白蛋白尿。实施需要了解每个替代物在哪些情况下可能表现良好,并将其使用限制在这些环境中。