Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Dec;64(6):848-59. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.08.017. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
There is increased interest in using alternative end points for trials of kidney disease progression. The currently established end points of end-stage renal disease and doubling of serum creatinine level, equivalent to a 57% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), are late events in chronic kidney disease (CKD), requiring large clinical trials with long follow-up. As part of a comprehensive evaluation of lesser declines in eGFR as alternative end points, we describe the consistency of treatment effects of intervention on the alternative and established end points in past trials.
Diagnostic test study.
SETTING & POPULATION: 9,488 participants from 37 randomized controlled trials of CKD progression across 5 intervention types.
Alternative end points including percentage change in eGFR from baseline (20%, 30%, 40%, and 57%) throughout study duration and to 12, 18, and 24 months. eGFR change confirmed versus nonconfirmed at the next visit.
The historically established end point of time to composite of treated kidney failure (end-stage renal disease), untreated kidney failure (GFR<15mL/min/1.73m(2)), or doubling of serum creatinine level throughout study duration.
Over a median of 3.62 years' follow-up, there were 3,070 established end points. Compared to the established end point, the number of alternative end points was greater for smaller versus larger declines in eGFR and longer versus shorter follow-up intervals. There was a general trend toward attenuation of the treatment effect with end points defined by a lesser eGFR decline, with greater attenuation with nonconfirmed end points, except for the low-protein-diet intervention, for which a stronger treatment effect was observed. The ratio (95% credible interval) of the HR for the alternative to established end point for the 5 intervention types ranged from 0.91 (0.64-1.43) to 1.12 (0.89-1.40) for 40% decline and from 0.88 (0.63-1.39) to 1.15 (0.88-1.54) for 30% decline for the overall study duration, indicating consistency of treatment effects.
Limited variety of interventions tested and low statistical power for many CKD clinical trials.
These results provide some support for the use of lesser eGFR declines as a surrogate end point, with stronger support for the 40% than 30% decline.
人们越来越感兴趣地将替代终点用于肾病进展试验。目前已确立的终末期肾脏疾病和血清肌酐水平翻倍的终点,相当于估算肾小球滤过率 (eGFR) 下降 57%,是慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 的晚期事件,需要进行长期随访的大型临床试验。作为对 eGFR 较小下降作为替代终点的综合评估的一部分,我们描述了过去试验中干预对替代和既定终点的治疗效果的一致性。
诊断测试研究。
来自 37 项 CKD 进展随机对照试验的 9488 名参与者,涉及 5 种干预类型。
替代终点包括整个研究期间和 12、18 和 24 个月时 eGFR 自基线的百分比变化(20%、30%、40%和 57%)。下一次就诊时确认或未确认 eGFR 变化。
历史上确立的终点是复合治疗性肾衰竭(终末期肾病)、未治疗性肾衰竭(GFR<15mL/min/1.73m2)或整个研究期间血清肌酐水平翻倍。
在中位数为 3.62 年的随访中,出现了 3070 个既定终点。与既定终点相比,eGFR 下降较小和随访间隔较长的替代终点数量更多。随着 eGFR 下降定义的终点减少,治疗效果呈减弱趋势,未确认终点的衰减更大,但低蛋白饮食干预除外,该干预观察到更强的治疗效果。5 种干预类型的替代终点与既定终点的 HR 比值(95%可信区间)在 40%下降时范围为 0.91(0.64-1.43)至 1.12(0.89-1.40),在 30%下降时范围为 0.88(0.63-1.39)至 1.15(0.88-1.54),表明治疗效果一致。
试验测试的干预措施种类有限,许多 CKD 临床试验的统计效力较低。
这些结果为使用较小的 eGFR 下降作为替代终点提供了一些支持,对于 40%的下降比 30%的下降有更强的支持。