Suppr超能文献

生物素干扰实验室检测风险的缓解最佳实践。

Best practices in mitigating the risk of biotin interference with laboratory testing.

机构信息

Stanford Health Care, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Baylor University Medical Center, 3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2019 Dec;74:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Abstract

Dietary biotin intake does not typically result in blood biotin concentrations that exceed interference thresholds for in vitro diagnostic tests. However, recent trends of high-dose biotin supplements and clinical trials of very high biotin doses for patients with multiple sclerosis have increased concerns about biotin interference with immunoassays. Estimates of the prevalence of high biotin intake vary, and patients may be unaware that they are taking biotin. Since 2016, 92 cases of suspected biotin interference have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. Immunoassays at greatest risk from biotin interference include thyroid and reproductive hormones, cardiac, and immunosuppressive drug tests. Several case studies have highlighted the challenge of biotin interference with thyroid hormone assays and the potential misdiagnosis of Graves' disease. Biotin interference should be suspected when immunoassay test results are inconsistent with clinical information; a clinically relevant biotin interference happens when the blood biotin concentration is high and the assay is sensitive to biotin. We propose a best practice workflow for laboratory scientists to evaluate discrepant immunoassay results, comprising: (1) serial dilution; (2) retesting after biotin clearance and/or repeat testing on an alternate platform; and (3) confirmation of the presence of biotin using depletion protocols or direct measurement of biotin concentrations. Efforts to increase awareness and avoid patient misdiagnosis should focus on improving guidance from manufacturers and educating patients, healthcare professionals, and laboratory staff. Best practice guidance for laboratory staff and healthcare professionals would also provide much-needed information on the prevention, detection, and management of biotin interference.

摘要

饮食生物素的摄入量通常不会导致血液生物素浓度超过体外诊断测试的干扰阈值。然而,最近高剂量生物素补充剂的趋势以及多发性硬化症患者极高剂量生物素的临床试验增加了人们对生物素干扰免疫测定的担忧。高生物素摄入量的患病率估计各不相同,而且患者可能不知道自己正在服用生物素。自 2016 年以来,美国食品和药物管理局已报告了 92 例疑似生物素干扰病例。最容易受到生物素干扰的免疫测定包括甲状腺和生殖激素、心脏和免疫抑制药物测试。几项案例研究强调了生物素干扰甲状腺激素测定的挑战以及格雷夫斯病误诊的可能性。当免疫测定测试结果与临床信息不一致时,应怀疑存在生物素干扰;当血液生物素浓度高且测定对生物素敏感时,就会发生临床相关的生物素干扰。我们提出了一个实验室科学家评估不一致的免疫测定结果的最佳实践工作流程,包括:(1)连续稀释;(2)在生物素清除后重新测试和/或在替代平台上重复测试;(3)使用消耗方案或直接测量生物素浓度来确认生物素的存在。提高认识和避免患者误诊的努力应侧重于改进制造商的指导,并教育患者、医疗保健专业人员和实验室工作人员。实验室工作人员和医疗保健专业人员的最佳实践指南还将提供有关生物素干扰的预防、检测和管理的急需信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验