Suppr超能文献

在线重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对认知加工的影响:一项荟萃分析及对未来研究的建议。

Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

机构信息

Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.

Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.018. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Abstract

Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), applied while subjects are performing a task, is widely used to disrupt brain regions underlying cognition. However, online rTMS has also induced "paradoxical enhancement". Given the rapid proliferation of this approach, it is crucial to develop a better understanding of how online stimulation influences cognition, and the optimal parameters to achieve desired effects. To accomplish this goal, a quantitative meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models fitted to reaction time (RT) and accuracy data. The final dataset included 126 studies published between 1998 and 2016, with 244 total effects for reaction times, and 202 for accuracy. Meta-analytically, rTMS at 10 Hz and 20 Hz disrupted accuracy for attention, executive, language, memory, motor, and perception domains, while no effects were found with 1 Hz or 5 Hz. Stimulation applied at and 10 and 20 Hz slowed down RTs in attention and perception tasks. No performance enhancement was found. Meta-regression analysis showed that fMRI-guided targeting and short inter-trial intervals are associated with increased disruptive effects with rTMS.

摘要

在线重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),在受试者执行任务时进行应用,广泛用于破坏认知的基础脑区。然而,在线 rTMS 也引起了“矛盾增强”。鉴于这种方法的迅速普及,因此,有必要更好地了解在线刺激如何影响认知,以及实现所需效果的最佳参数。为了实现这一目标,采用随机效应模型对反应时(RT)和准确性数据进行了定量荟萃分析。最终数据集包括 1998 年至 2016 年间发表的 126 项研究,其中 244 项用于反应时间,202 项用于准确性。荟萃分析表明,10 Hz 和 20 Hz 的 rTMS 破坏了注意力、执行、语言、记忆、运动和感知领域的准确性,而 1 Hz 或 5 Hz 则没有影响。刺激在 10 Hz 和 20 Hz 时会降低注意力和感知任务中的 RT。没有发现表现增强。元回归分析表明,fMRI 引导的靶向和短的试验间间隔与 rTMS 的破坏效应增加有关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Electric-field-based dosing for TMS.基于电场的经颅磁刺激剂量控制
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Mar 11;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00106. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
The Dynamic Duo: Combining noninvasive brain stimulation with cognitive interventions.“动态二人组”:将非侵入性脑刺激与认知干预相结合。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 8;89:347-360. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
Uncertain relational reasoning in the parietal cortex.顶叶皮质中的不确定关系推理。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Apr;104:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验