Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.018. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), applied while subjects are performing a task, is widely used to disrupt brain regions underlying cognition. However, online rTMS has also induced "paradoxical enhancement". Given the rapid proliferation of this approach, it is crucial to develop a better understanding of how online stimulation influences cognition, and the optimal parameters to achieve desired effects. To accomplish this goal, a quantitative meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models fitted to reaction time (RT) and accuracy data. The final dataset included 126 studies published between 1998 and 2016, with 244 total effects for reaction times, and 202 for accuracy. Meta-analytically, rTMS at 10 Hz and 20 Hz disrupted accuracy for attention, executive, language, memory, motor, and perception domains, while no effects were found with 1 Hz or 5 Hz. Stimulation applied at and 10 and 20 Hz slowed down RTs in attention and perception tasks. No performance enhancement was found. Meta-regression analysis showed that fMRI-guided targeting and short inter-trial intervals are associated with increased disruptive effects with rTMS.
在线重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),在受试者执行任务时进行应用,广泛用于破坏认知的基础脑区。然而,在线 rTMS 也引起了“矛盾增强”。鉴于这种方法的迅速普及,因此,有必要更好地了解在线刺激如何影响认知,以及实现所需效果的最佳参数。为了实现这一目标,采用随机效应模型对反应时(RT)和准确性数据进行了定量荟萃分析。最终数据集包括 1998 年至 2016 年间发表的 126 项研究,其中 244 项用于反应时间,202 项用于准确性。荟萃分析表明,10 Hz 和 20 Hz 的 rTMS 破坏了注意力、执行、语言、记忆、运动和感知领域的准确性,而 1 Hz 或 5 Hz 则没有影响。刺激在 10 Hz 和 20 Hz 时会降低注意力和感知任务中的 RT。没有发现表现增强。元回归分析表明,fMRI 引导的靶向和短的试验间间隔与 rTMS 的破坏效应增加有关。