• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?

How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9
PMID:31473884
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients can avoid systematic prostate biopsy (PBx) if their Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADs v2) score is ≤ 3 and how we clinicians make decisions that can maximize benefit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our prospectively maintained database of consecutive men who received transrectal ultrasound-guided 24-core biopsy as well as pre-biopsy multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI). Of the 1276 men who were performed PBx in our institution from 2012 to July 2018, 491 patients conformed to the criteria. Negative predictive value (NPV) of negative mp-MRI (defined as PI-RADs < 3) combined prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) were calculated. Models based on PI-RADs v2 were developed to predict the absence of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) and prostate cancer (PCa). Nomograms as well as receiver operating curves (ROC) were established to estimate the discrimination. Calibration curves were used to assess the concordance between predictive value and true risk. Decision curves were made to measure the overall net benefit.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer and CSPCa detection rates were 21.6%, 7.3% and 36.7%, 23.4% in PIRADs v2 < 3 cohort and PIRADs v2 = 3 cohort, respectively. Men with biopsy-proved CSPCa had higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA), lower prostate volume (PV) and higher PSAD (all p < 0.05 in the two cohorts) than patients with clinically insignificant prostate cancer (CIPCa) or negative results. NPV of negative mp-MRI for detection of PCa was much higher when the PSAD was less than 0.15 (p < 0.001) and 0.2 for CSPCa (p = 0.007). According to multivariate analysis, we developed the model comprising Age, PSAD and PI-RADs v2 to predict the absence of CSPCa and PCa. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model for non-CSPCa was 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.80, PSAD cutoff 0.20), better than 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.80, PSAD cutoff 0.15). As for model for non-PCa, the AUC was 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.80, PSAD cutoff 0.15), higher than 0.71(95% CI 0.67-0.78, PSAD cutoff 0.20). Internally validated calibration curves showed that the model might overestimated the risk of the absence of CSPCa when the threshold was between 53 and 72%, and if the threshold was between 72 and 87%, it might underestimate the risk. As for the absence of PCa, the model might overestimate the risk between 52 and 76%. Decision curves showed that a better clinical net benefit was met when the threshold was 55% for non-PCa and 70% for non-CSPCa.

CONCLUSIONS

NPV of negative mp-MRI for detection of CSPCa and PCa was improved with decreasing PSAD. The nomograms based on PI-RADs v2, age and PSAD showed internally validated high discrimination and calibration for the absence of PCa and CSPCa. When the predictive value was greater than 70% for the absence of CSPCa and 55% for the absence of PCa, we could avoid unnecessary PBx to maximize net benefit.

摘要

目的

确定如果患者的前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS v2)评分≤3,他们是否可以避免进行系统性前列腺活检(PBx),以及我们的临床医生如何做出可以最大化获益的决策。

材料与方法

我们回顾了我们前瞻性维护的连续接受经直肠超声引导 24 针活检以及术前多参数磁共振成像(mp-MRI)的男性数据库。在我们机构从 2012 年至 2018 年 7 月进行 PBx 的 1276 名男性中,491 名患者符合标准。计算了阴性 mp-MRI(定义为 PI-RADs<3)联合前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)的阴性预测值(NPV)。基于 PI-RADs v2 建立了预测无临床显著前列腺癌(CSPCa)和前列腺癌(PCa)的模型。建立了列线图和接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)来估计区分度。使用校准曲线来评估预测值与真实风险之间的一致性。使用决策曲线来衡量整体净获益。

结果

PI-RADs v2<3 队列和 PI-RADs v2=3 队列的前列腺癌和 CSPCa 检出率分别为 21.6%、7.3%和 36.7%、23.4%。活检证实的 CSPCa 患者的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)更高,前列腺体积(PV)更小,PSAD 更高(两个队列中的所有差异均<0.05),而临床意义不显著的前列腺癌(CIPCa)或阴性结果的患者则更低。当 PSAD 小于 0.15(p<0.001)和 0.2 时,阴性 mp-MRI 对 PCa 的 NPV 要高得多(p=0.007 对 CSPCa)。根据多变量分析,我们建立了包含年龄、PSAD 和 PI-RADS v2 的模型,用于预测 CSPCa 和 PCa 的缺失。非 CSPCa 模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.75(95%CI 0.68-0.80,PSAD 截断值为 0.20),优于 0.71(95%CI 0.65-0.80,PSAD 截断值为 0.15)。对于非 PCa 模型,AUC 为 0.76(95%CI 0.70-0.80,PSAD 截断值为 0.15),高于 0.71(95%CI 0.67-0.78,PSAD 截断值为 0.20)。内部验证的校准曲线表明,当阈值在 53%至 72%之间时,该模型可能高估了 CSPCa 缺失的风险,而当阈值在 72%至 87%之间时,该模型可能低估了风险。对于 PCa 的缺失,该模型可能高估了 52%至 76%之间的风险。决策曲线表明,当阈值为非 PCa 时为 55%,非 CSPCa 时为 70%时,可获得更好的临床净获益。

结论

随着 PSAD 的降低,阴性 mp-MRI 对 CSPCa 和 PCa 的检测 NPV 得到改善。基于 PI-RADS v2、年龄和 PSAD 的列线图显示了对 PCa 和 CSPCa 缺失的内部验证高区分度和校准。当 CSPCa 缺失的预测值大于 70%,PCa 缺失的预测值大于 55%时,我们可以避免不必要的 PBx 以最大化净获益。

相似文献

1
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
2
Performing Precise Biopsy in Naive Patients With Equivocal PI-RADS, Version 2, Score 3, Lesions: An MRI-based Nomogram to Avoid Unnecessary Surgical Intervention.对PI-RADS v2版评分为3分的初诊可疑病变患者进行精准活检:一种基于MRI的列线图以避免不必要的手术干预
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Oct;18(5):367-377. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版能否减少 PSA 水平在 4-10ng/ml 的男性进行不必要的前列腺活检?
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 May;144(5):987-995. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2616-6. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
4
The Role of PSA Density among PI-RADS v2.1 Categories to Avoid an Unnecessary Transition Zone Biopsy in Patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.前列腺特异性抗原密度在PI-RADS v2.1分类中对避免血清前列腺特异性抗原水平为4-20 ng/mL患者进行不必要的移行带活检的作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Oct 11;2021:3995789. doi: 10.1155/2021/3995789. eCollection 2021.
5
[Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版诊断评分在3.0T多参数磁共振成像联合前列腺特异性抗原密度用于前列腺癌的初步适用性评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 19;97(47):3693-3698. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.47.003.
6
Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.PI-RADS v2.1 联合 PSAD 对临床显著前列腺癌的诊断价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Oct;47(10):3574-3582. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03592-4. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
7
Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI.MRI 检查 PI-RADS 3 类病变患者中,预测前列腺癌的最佳 PSA 密度阈值和预测因素。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Aug;41(8):354.e11-354.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
8
The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China.前列腺特异性抗原密度和阴性多参数磁共振成像在排除前列腺癌中的作用:来自中国一家高容量中心的临床结果。
Asian J Androl. 2022 Nov-Dec;24(6):615-619. doi: 10.4103/aja202220.
9
Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml to 10 ng ml.结合临床参数和多参数磁共振成像对前列腺特异性抗原 4ng/ml 至 10ng/ml 的男性进行分层,以制定最佳的诊断策略。
Asian J Androl. 2023;25(4):492-498. doi: 10.4103/aja202288.
10
MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.MRI 联合 PSA 密度在检测 PSA 血清水平为 4∼10ng/mL 的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:双参数与多参数 MRI。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Apr;101(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of gray zone PSA and PSAD correlated with PIRADS v2.1 in the MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy era: a retrospective bi-centre study.MRI-US融合前列腺活检时代灰色地带前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)与前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)v2.1的相关性分析:一项回顾性双中心研究
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04551-w.
2
Development of novel nomograms for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients with PSA < 10 ng/ml and PI-RADS ≤ 3 lesions.用于预测PSA<10 ng/ml且PI-RADS≤3类病变的未接受活检患者前列腺癌的新型列线图的开发。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;14:1500010. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1500010. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Which Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Safely Avoid Biopsy for Prostate Cancer?哪些磁共振成像阴性的前列腺癌患者可以安全避免活检?
J Urol. 2019 Feb;201(2):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.046.
2
Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer.基于 PI-RADs v2 的临床显著前列腺癌模型的建立与内部验证。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;16(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1367-9.
3
Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review.
系统活检在靶向活检时代的作用:综述。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 3;31(9):5171-5194. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090383.
4
Urine biomarkers can predict prostate cancer and PI-RADS score prior to biopsy.尿液生物标志物可预测前列腺癌和活检前的 PI-RADS 评分。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 5;14(1):18148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68026-1.
5
Refining clinically relevant cut-offs of prostate specific antigen density for risk stratification in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions.优化前列腺特异性抗原密度的临床相关临界值,用于PI-RADS 3类病变患者的风险分层。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Mar;28(1):173-179. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00872-6. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
6
Assessment of the accuracy of biparametric MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy for index tumor evaluation using postoperative pathology specimens.使用术后病理标本评估双参数 MRI/TRUS 融合引导活检对指数肿瘤评估的准确性。
BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01473-0.
7
Prostate Biopsy in the Case of PIRADS 5-Is Systematic Biopsy Mandatory?PI-RADS 5 情况下的前列腺活检——系统活检是必需的吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 28;12(17):5612. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175612.
8
A prospective study of the prostate health index density and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer.一项前列腺健康指数密度和多参数磁共振成像在诊断临床显著前列腺癌中的前瞻性研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Jul;64(4):363-372. doi: 10.4111/icu.20230060.
9
PSA change after antibiotic treatment should not affect decisionmaking on performing a prostate biopsy.抗生素治疗后 PSA 的变化不应影响前列腺活检的决策。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;53(1):183-192. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5571. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
10
Developing a predictive model for clinically significant prostate cancer by combining age, PSA density, and mpMRI.通过结合年龄、PSA 密度和 mpMRI 开发用于预测临床显著前列腺癌的模型。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar 7;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02959-1.
前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版用于前列腺癌检测的验证。
J Urol. 2018 Oct;200(4):767-773. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 5.
4
Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?前列腺癌的负多参数磁共振成像:下一步是什么?
Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
5
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
6
Defining a Cohort that May Not Require Repeat Prostate Biopsy Based on PCA3 Score and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Dual Negative Effect.基于 PCA3 评分和磁共振成像定义可能不需要重复前列腺活检的队列:双重阴性效应。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1182-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.074. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
7
The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.PSAD 值联合 PI-RADS™ 对前列腺癌预测准确性的价值。
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):575-582. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.130. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版检测前列腺癌的诊断性能:系统评价和诊断荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.042. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.多参数 MRI 和 TRUS 活检在前列腺癌(PROMIS)中的诊断准确性:一项配对验证性研究。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?为什么在初次活检的男性中,多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)引导下经直肠超声(TRUS)引导活检会遗漏显著的前列腺癌?遗漏的部位在哪里?
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):896-903. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 4.