• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用术后病理标本评估双参数 MRI/TRUS 融合引导活检对指数肿瘤评估的准确性。

Assessment of the accuracy of biparametric MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy for index tumor evaluation using postoperative pathology specimens.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1, Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01473-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-024-01473-0
PMID:38575912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10996083/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is widely used for the diagnosis, surveillance, and staging of prostate cancer. However, it has several limitations, including higher costs, longer examination times, and the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of preoperatively assessed index tumors (ITs) using biparametric MRI (bpMRI)/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion biopsy compared with radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.

METHODS

We included 113 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer through bpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies of lesions with a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category ≥ 3. These patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) at our institution between July 2017 and March 2023. We examined the localization of preoperative and postoperative ITs, the highest Gleason score (GS), and tumor diameter in these patients.

RESULTS

The preoperative cT stage matched the postoperative pT stage in 53 cases (47%), while 31 cases (27%) were upstaged, and 29 cases (26%) were downstaged (Weighted Kappa = 0.21). The preoperative and postoperative IT localizations were consistent in 97 cases (86%). The concordance rate between Gleason groups in targeted biopsies and RP specimens was 51%, with an upgrade in 25 cases (23%) and a downgrade in 27 cases (25%) (Weighted Kappa = 0.42). The maximum diameter of the IT and the maximum cancer core length on biopsy were correlated with the RP tumor's maximum diameter (p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of bpMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy is comparable to mpMRI, suggesting that it can be a cost-effective and time-saving alternative.

摘要

背景

多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)广泛用于前列腺癌的诊断、监测和分期。然而,它存在一些局限性,包括更高的成本、更长的检查时间以及使用钆基造影剂。本研究旨在探讨使用双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)/经直肠超声(TRUS)融合活检术前评估的指数肿瘤(IT)与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本的准确性。

方法

我们纳入了 113 名通过 bpMRI/TRUS 融合引导活检诊断为前列腺癌的患者,这些患者的病变前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分≥3。这些患者在我们机构接受了机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RARP),时间在 2017 年 7 月至 2023 年 3 月之间。我们检查了这些患者的术前和术后 IT 定位、最高 Gleason 评分(GS)和肿瘤直径。

结果

53 例(47%)患者术前 cT 期与术后 pT 期相匹配,31 例(27%)患者分期升高,29 例(26%)患者分期降低(加权 Kappa=0.21)。97 例(86%)患者的术前和术后 IT 定位一致。靶向活检和 RP 标本的 Gleason 分组之间的一致性率为 51%,其中 25 例(23%)升级,27 例(25%)降级(加权 Kappa=0.42)。IT 的最大直径和活检中最大癌核长度与 RP 肿瘤的最大直径相关(两者均 p<0.001)。

结论

bpMRI/TRUS 融合活检的诊断准确性与 mpMRI 相当,提示其是一种具有成本效益和节省时间的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11b/10996083/5cfcca30bf1b/12894_2024_1473_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11b/10996083/5cfcca30bf1b/12894_2024_1473_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11b/10996083/5cfcca30bf1b/12894_2024_1473_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the accuracy of biparametric MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy for index tumor evaluation using postoperative pathology specimens.使用术后病理标本评估双参数 MRI/TRUS 融合引导活检对指数肿瘤评估的准确性。
BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01473-0.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.磁共振成像-经直肠超声图像融合活检能准确描绘出目标肿瘤:与 135 例患者的分段式根治性前列腺切除术标本的相关性。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):787-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.077. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
3
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.多参数磁共振成像(MRI)和 MRI-经直肠超声融合活检用于检测起始肿瘤:与根治性前列腺切除术标本的相关性。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):846-853. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Comparison of Positive Predictive Values of Biparametric MRI and Multiparametric MRI-directed Transrectal US-guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy.对比双参数 MRI 和多参数 MRI 引导经直肠超声靶向前列腺活检的阳性预测值。
Radiology. 2024 Jun;311(3):e231383. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231383.
5
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
6
Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?前列腺多参数和双参数 MRI 比较:常规检查需要使用基于钆的造影剂吗?
World J Urol. 2019 Apr;37(4):691-699. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2428-y. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
7
Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.多参数 MRI 提高经直肠超声引导前列腺活检单独诊断前列腺癌的检出率:PROMIS 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jul;22(39):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta22390.
8
Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.前列腺机器人辅助经会阴融合前列腺活检前前列腺双参数与多参数 MRI 的头对头比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2431-2438. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04120-1. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
9
Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.基于 MRI 靶向穿刺和高风险前列腺癌根治术患者手术标本的转录组全分析:靶向必须命中。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):540-546. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
10
Concordance between biparametric MRI, transperineal targeted plus systematic MRI-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy, and radical prostatectomy pathology.双参数 MRI、经会阴靶向加系统 MRI-超声融合前列腺活检与根治性前列腺切除术病理的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 28;12(1):6964. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10672-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of Perilesional Sampling of Patients Undergoing Fusion Prostate Biopsies.融合前列腺活检患者病变周围取样的作用
Life (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;13(8):1719. doi: 10.3390/life13081719.
2
Optimal Number of Systematic Biopsy Cores Used in Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy.磁共振成像/经直肠超声融合靶向前列腺活检中系统活检核心组织的最佳数量
Yonago Acta Med. 2021 Jul 9;64(3):260-268. doi: 10.33160/yam.2021.08.004. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后阳性切缘状态对早期生化复发的预测影响。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;26(10):1961-1967. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01977-x. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
PI-RADS Committee Position on MRI Without Contrast Medium in Biopsy-Naive Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer: Narrative Review.PI-RADS 委员会关于在未经活检的疑似前列腺癌男性中进行 MRI 无造影剂检查的立场:叙述性综述。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jan;216(1):3-19. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24268. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
5
Reconsidering Prostate Cancer Mortality - The Future of PSA Screening.重新审视前列腺癌死亡率——前列腺特异性抗原筛查的未来
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1557-1563. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1914228.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.二参数与三参数前列腺 MRI 诊断准确性:评估临床实践中的对比获益。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):4039-4049. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06782-0. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
8
Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.多参数 MRI 用于前列腺癌诊断:现状与未来方向。
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Jan;17(1):41-61. doi: 10.1038/s41585-019-0212-4. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
9
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2.1 版:前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版 2019 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI).双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)在不同经验水平的阅片者中对前列腺癌的检测:与多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)的比较及性能评估。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 May;44(5):1883-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01934-3.