University of Connecticut, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, 348 Mansfield Rd., U-1058, Storrs, CT 06269-1058, United States of America.
University of Connecticut, United States of America.
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Aug;75:8-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
Although contact-based interventions are the cornerstone of prejudice reduction, in high-conflict environments, incendiary contact with outgroups can instead exacerbate negative attitudes. Supplementing contact interventions with social-cognitive/emotional approaches may, instead, help facilitate positive contact. This study evaluated the effectiveness of two prejudice reduction interventions among 148 Palestinian-Israeli and 154 Jewish-Israeli 5th grade students (M = 10.55, SD = 0.26) in a high conflict area. Schools in Jaffa, Israel were assigned to a social-cognitive/emotional skills-based intervention, a skills- and contact-based intervention (i.e., skills, skills+contact), or the control group-all delivered as part of the curriculum. Prejudice was assessed through participants' judgments of and justifications about hypothetical scenarios of intergroup exclusion in peer and home contexts at pre-test, post-test, and 6-month follow-up. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed various main effects including gender, ethnicity, and context in which the exclusion occurred (peer/home). Significant higher level interactions with group by time demonstrated the positive influence of both treatment groups on prejudice reduction. The skills and skills+contact groups became more rejecting while the control group became more accepting of exclusion across time. Additionally, the skills and skills+contact groups increased in moral and empathic reasoning over time, whereas the control group increased in social conventional and stereotyped prejudiced reasoning. These findings illustrate the effectiveness of in-school social-cognitive/emotional skills and combined skills+contact approaches in reducing the prejudiced attitudes of Palestinian- and Jewish-Israeli pre-adolescents, especially in areas with protracted conflict.
虽然基于接触的干预措施是减少偏见的基石,但在高冲突环境中,与外群体的煽动性接触反而会加剧负面态度。通过社交认知/情感方法补充接触干预措施,反而有助于促进积极的接触。本研究评估了两种偏见减少干预措施在 148 名巴勒斯坦-以色列和 154 名犹太-以色列五年级学生(M=10.55,SD=0.26)中的有效性,这些学生来自一个高冲突地区。以色列雅法的学校被分配到一个基于社交认知/情感技能的干预组、一个基于技能和接触的干预组(即技能、技能+接触)或对照组——所有这些都作为课程的一部分提供。偏见通过参与者对同伴和家庭背景下群体排斥的假设情景的判断和理由来评估,在预测试、后测试和 6 个月随访时进行。重复测量方差分析显示了各种主要效应,包括性别、种族和排斥发生的背景(同伴/家庭)。与群体和时间的显著高水平交互表明,这两种治疗组都对减少偏见产生了积极影响。技能组和技能+接触组随着时间的推移变得更加排斥,而对照组则变得更加接受排斥。此外,技能组和技能+接触组随着时间的推移,在道德和移情推理方面有所增加,而对照组在社会传统和刻板偏见推理方面有所增加。这些发现说明了在学校进行社交认知/情感技能和结合技能+接触方法的有效性,可以减少巴勒斯坦和犹太-以色列青春期前儿童的偏见态度,特别是在长期冲突的地区。