Suppr超能文献

理解农村急诊科实施远程医疗的障碍。

Understanding Barriers to Telemedicine Implementation in Rural Emergency Departments.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;75(3):392-399. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Telemedicine has potential to add value to the delivery of emergency care in rural emergency departments (EDs); however, previous work suggests that it may be underused. We seek to understand barriers to telemedicine implementation in rural EDs, and to describe characteristics of rural EDs that do and do not use telemedicine.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory survey, identifying rural EDs that did and did not use telemedicine in 2016. All rural EDs that did not use telemedicine were administered a follow-up survey asking about ED staffing, transfer patterns, and perceived barriers to telemedicine use. We used a similar instrument to survey a sample of EDs that did use telemedicine, but we replaced the question about barriers with questions related to telemedicine use. Data are presented with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

We identified 977 rural EDs responding to the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA survey; 453 (46%; 95% confidence interval 43% to 50%) did not use telemedicine. Among rural nonusers, 374 EDs (83%; 95% confidence interval 79% to 86%) responded to our second survey. Of the 177 rural EDs using telemedicine that we surveyed, 153 responded (86%; 95% confidence interval 80% to 91%). Among rural EDs not using telemedicine, 235 (67%) reported that their ED, hospital, or health system leadership had considered it. Cost was the most commonly cited reason for lack of adoption (n=86; 37%).

CONCLUSION

Among US rural EDs, cost is a commonly reported barrier that may be limiting the extent of telemedicine adoption.

摘要

研究目的

远程医疗有可能为农村急诊部(ED)的急救服务增加价值;然而,之前的研究表明,远程医疗的使用可能不足。我们旨在了解农村 ED 实施远程医疗的障碍,并描述使用和不使用远程医疗的农村 ED 的特点。

方法

我们对 2016 年国家急诊部清单调查的数据进行了二次分析,确定了 2016 年使用和不使用远程医疗的农村 ED。所有未使用远程医疗的农村 ED 都接受了一项后续调查,询问 ED 人员配备、转院模式以及对使用远程医疗的感知障碍。我们使用类似的工具对使用远程医疗的 ED 进行了抽样调查,但我们用与远程医疗使用相关的问题代替了有关障碍的问题。数据以描述性统计呈现。

结果

我们从 2016 年国家急诊部清单调查中确定了 977 家回应调查的农村 ED;其中 453 家(46%;95%置信区间 43%至 50%)未使用远程医疗。在农村非使用者中,有 374 家 ED(83%;95%置信区间 79%至 86%)回应了我们的第二份调查。在接受调查的 177 家使用远程医疗的农村 ED 中,有 153 家(86%;95%置信区间 80%至 91%)做出了回应。在不使用远程医疗的农村 ED 中,有 235 家(67%)报告称,其 ED、医院或卫生系统领导层已经考虑过使用。缺乏资金是阻碍采用的最常见原因(n=86;37%)。

结论

在美国农村 ED 中,成本是一个常见的报告障碍,可能限制了远程医疗的采用程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验