Hayden Emily M, Boggs Krislyn M, Espinola Janice A, Camargo Carlos A, Zachrison Kori S
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;76(5):602-608. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 1.
Interhospital transfers are costly to patients and to the health care system. The use of telemedicine may enable more efficient systems by decreasing transfers or diverting transfers from crowded referral emergency departments (EDs) to alternative appropriate facilities. Our primary objective is to describe the prevalence of telemedicine for transfer coordination among US EDs, the ways in which it is used, and characteristics of EDs that use telemedicine for transfer coordination.
We used the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA survey to identify telemedicine-using EDs. We then surveyed all EDs using telemedicine for transfer coordination and a sample of EDs using telemedicine for other clinical applications. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify characteristics independently associated with use of telemedicine for transfer coordination.
Of the 5,375 EDs open in 2016, 4,507 responded to National Emergency Department Inventory-USA (84%). Only 146 EDs used telemedicine for transfer coordination; of these, 79 (54%) used telemedicine to assist with clinical care for local admission, 117 (80%) to assist with care before transfer, and 92 (63%) for arranging transfer to a different hospital. Among telemedicine-using EDs, lower ED annual visit volume (odds ratio 5.87, 95% CI 2.79 to 12.36) was independently associated with use of telemedicine for transfer coordination.
Although telemedicine has potential to improve efficiency of regional emergency care systems, it is infrequently used for coordination of transfer between EDs. When used, it is most often to assist with clinical care before transfer.
医院间转运对患者和医疗系统而言成本高昂。远程医疗的应用或许能通过减少转运或将拥挤的转诊急诊科(ED)的转运转移至其他合适的医疗机构,从而实现更高效的系统。我们的主要目的是描述美国急诊科中用于转运协调的远程医疗的普及情况、其使用方式以及使用远程医疗进行转运协调的急诊科的特征。
我们使用2016年美国国家急诊科库存调查来确定使用远程医疗的急诊科。然后,我们对所有使用远程医疗进行转运协调的急诊科以及使用远程医疗进行其他临床应用的急诊科样本进行了调查。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定与使用远程医疗进行转运协调独立相关的特征。
在2016年开放的5375家急诊科中,4507家对美国国家急诊科库存调查做出了回应(84%)。只有146家急诊科使用远程医疗进行转运协调;其中,79家(54%)使用远程医疗协助当地住院的临床护理,117家(80%)协助转运前的护理,92家(63%)用于安排转至其他医院。在使用远程医疗的急诊科中,较低的急诊科年就诊量(比值比5.87,95%置信区间2.79至12.36)与使用远程医疗进行转运协调独立相关。
尽管远程医疗有潜力提高区域急诊医疗系统的效率,但它很少用于急诊科之间的转运协调。当被使用时,它最常用于协助转运前的临床护理。