Li Richard, Shinde Ashwin, Han Ernest, Lee Stephen, Beriwal Sushil, Harkenrider Matthew, Kamrava Mitchell, Chen Yi-Jen, Glaser Scott
Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Sep;29(7):1086-1093. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000264.
Randomized trials describe differing sets of high-intermediate risk criteria.
To use the National Cancer Database to compare the impact of radiation therapy in patients with stage I endometrial cancer meeting different criteria, and define a classification of "unfavorable risk."
Patients with stage I endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database and stratified into two cohorts: (1) patients meeting Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-99 criteria only for high-intermediate risk, but not Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC)-1 criteria and (2) those meeting PORTEC-1 criteria only. High-risk stage I patients with both FIGO stage IB (under FIGO 2009 staging) and grade 3 disease were excluded. In each cohort, propensity score-matched survival analyses were performed. Based on these analyses, we propose a new classification of unfavorable risk. We then analyzed the association of adjuvant radiation with survival, stratified by this classification.
We identified 117,272 patients with stage I endometrial cancer. Of these, 11,207 patients met GOG-99 criteria only and 5,920 patients met PORTEC-1 criteria only. After propensity score matching, adjuvant radiation therapy improved survival (HR=0.73; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89; p=0.002) in the GOG-99 only cohort. However, there was no benefit of adjuvant radiation (HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.14; p=0.355) in the PORTEC-1 only cohort. We, therefore, defined unfavorable risk stage I endometrial cancer as two or more of the following risk factors: lymphovascular invasion, age ≥70, grade 2-3 disease, and FIGO stage IB. Adjuvant radiation improved survival in stage I patients with adverse risk factors (HR=0.74; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.80; p<0.001), but not in other stage I patients (HR=1.02; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15; p=0.710; p interaction <0.001).
Our study showed that adjuvant radiation was associated with an overall survival benefit in patients meeting GOG-99 criteria only; however, no survival benefit was seen in patients meeting PORTEC-1 criteria only. We propose a definition of unfavorable risk stage I endometrial cancer: ≥2 risk factors from among lymphovascular invasion, age ≥70, grade 2-3 disease, and FIGO stage IB disease.
随机试验描述了不同的高中风险标准集。
利用国家癌症数据库比较符合不同标准的I期子宫内膜癌患者接受放射治疗的影响,并定义“不良风险”分类。
在国家癌症数据库中识别出2010年1月至2014年12月期间的I期子宫内膜癌患者,并将其分为两个队列:(1)仅符合妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)-99高中风险标准但不符合子宫内膜癌术后放射治疗(PORTEC)-1标准的患者;(2)仅符合PORTEC-1标准的患者。排除同时具有国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2009分期下的IB期和3级疾病的高危I期患者。在每个队列中,进行倾向评分匹配的生存分析。基于这些分析,我们提出了一种新的不良风险分类。然后,我们分析了辅助放疗与生存的关联,并按此分类进行分层。
我们识别出117,272例I期子宫内膜癌患者。其中,11,207例患者仅符合GOG-99标准,5,920例患者仅符合PORTEC-1标准。倾向评分匹配后,在仅符合GOG-99标准的队列中,辅助放疗改善了生存(风险比[HR]=0.73;95%置信区间[CI]为0.60至0.89;p=0.002)。然而,在仅符合PORTEC-1标准的队列中,辅助放疗没有益处(HR=0.89;95%CI为0.69至1.14;p=0.355)。因此,我们将不良风险I期子宫内膜癌定义为以下两个或更多风险因素:淋巴管浸润、年龄≥70岁、2-3级疾病和FIGO IB期。辅助放疗改善了具有不良风险因素的I期患者的生存(HR=0.74;95%CI为0.68至0.80;p<0.001),但在其他I期患者中没有改善(HR=1.02;95%CI为0.91至1.15;p=0.710;p交互作用<0.001)。
我们的研究表明,辅助放疗与仅符合GOG-99标准的患者的总生存获益相关;然而,仅符合PORTEC-1标准的患者未观察到生存获益。我们提出了不良风险I期子宫内膜癌的定义:淋巴管浸润、年龄≥70岁、2-3级疾病和FIGO IB期疾病中的≥2个风险因素。