Margiotta-Casaluci Luigi, Owen Stewart F, Rand-Weaver Mariann, Winter Matthew J
College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom.
Global Safety, Health & Environment, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 16;10:893. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00893. eCollection 2019.
The zebrafish is rapidly emerging as a promising alternative model for the detection of drug-induced cardiovascular effects. Despite its increasing popularity, the ability of this model to inform the drug development process is often limited by the uncertainties around the quantitative relevance of zebrafish responses compared with nonclinical mammalian species and ultimately humans. In this test of concept study, we provide a comparative quantitative analysis of the cardiovascular responses of zebrafish, rat, dog, and human to three model compounds (propranolol, losartan, and captopril), which act as modulators of two key systems (beta-adrenergic and renin-angiotensin systems) involved in the regulation of cardiovascular functions. We used imaging techniques to generate novel experimental data of drug-mediated cardiovascular effects in zebrafish larvae. These data were combined with a database of interspecies mammalian responses (i.e., heart rate, blood flow, vessel diameter, and stroke volume) extracted from the literature to perform a meta-analysis of effect size and direction across multiple species. In spite of the high heterogeneity of study design parameters, our analysis highlighted that zebrafish and human responses were largely comparable in >80% of drug/endpoint combinations. However, it also revealed a high intraspecies variability, which, in some cases, prevented a conclusive interpretation of the drug-induced effect. Despite the shortcomings of our study, the meta-analysis approach, combined with a suitable data visualization strategy, enabled us to observe patterns of response that would likely remain undetected with more traditional methods of qualitative comparative analysis. We propose that expanding this approach to larger datasets encompassing multiple drugs and modes of action would enable a rigorous and systematic assessment of the applicability domain of the zebrafish from both a mechanistic and phenotypic standpoint. This will increase the confidence in its application for the early detection of adverse drug reactions in any major organ system.
斑马鱼正迅速成为一种有前景的替代模型,用于检测药物引起的心血管效应。尽管其越来越受欢迎,但与非临床哺乳动物物种乃至最终与人类相比,该模型为药物研发过程提供信息的能力往往受到斑马鱼反应定量相关性方面不确定性的限制。在这项概念验证研究中,我们对斑马鱼、大鼠、狗和人类对三种模型化合物(普萘洛尔、氯沙坦和卡托普利)的心血管反应进行了比较定量分析,这三种化合物是参与心血管功能调节的两个关键系统(β-肾上腺素能和肾素-血管紧张素系统)的调节剂。我们使用成像技术生成了斑马鱼幼虫中药物介导的心血管效应的新实验数据。这些数据与从文献中提取的种间哺乳动物反应数据库(即心率、血流量、血管直径和每搏输出量)相结合,以对多个物种的效应大小和方向进行荟萃分析。尽管研究设计参数存在高度异质性,但我们的分析强调,在超过80%的药物/终点组合中,斑马鱼和人类的反应在很大程度上是可比的。然而,分析还揭示了较高的种内变异性,在某些情况下,这妨碍了对药物诱导效应的确定性解释。尽管我们的研究存在缺陷,但荟萃分析方法与合适的数据可视化策略相结合,使我们能够观察到用更传统的定性比较分析方法可能无法发现的反应模式。我们建议,将这种方法扩展到包含多种药物和作用模式的更大数据集,将能够从机制和表型角度对斑马鱼的适用范围进行严格而系统的评估。这将增加其在早期检测任何主要器官系统药物不良反应方面应用的信心。