School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Stat Med. 2019 Nov 20;38(26):5085-5102. doi: 10.1002/sim.8352. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
Avin et al (2005) showed that, in the presence of exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounding, decomposing the total causal effect (TCE) using standard conditional exchangeability assumptions is not possible even under a nonparametric structural equation model with all confounders observed. Subsequent research has investigated the assumptions required for such a decomposition to be identifiable and estimable from observed data. One approach was proposed by VanderWeele et al (2014). They decomposed the TCE under three different scenarios: (1) treating the mediator and the exposure-induced confounder as joint mediators; (2) generating path-specific effects albeit without distinguishing between multiple distinct paths through the exposure-induced confounder; and (3) using so-called randomised interventional analogues where sampling values from the distribution of the mediator within the levels of the exposure effectively marginalises over the exposure-induced confounder. In this paper, we extend their approach to the case where there are multiple mediators that do not influence each other directly but which are all influenced by an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder. We provide a motivating example and results from a simulation study based on from our work in dental epidemiology featuring the 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohort in Brazil.
Avin 等人(2005 年)表明,即使在存在暴露引起的中介-结局混杂的情况下,使用标准的条件可交换性假设分解总因果效应(TCE)也是不可能的,即使使用具有所有混杂因素的非参数结构方程模型也是如此。随后的研究调查了从观察数据中可识别和估计这种分解所需的假设。VanderWeele 等人(2014 年)提出了一种方法。他们在三种不同情况下对 TCE 进行了分解:(1)将中介和暴露引起的混杂因素视为联合中介;(2)尽管没有区分通过暴露引起的混杂因素的多个不同路径,但生成特定路径的效应;(3)使用所谓的随机干预模拟,其中从暴露水平内的中介的分布中采样值实际上是对暴露引起的混杂因素进行边缘化。在本文中,我们将他们的方法扩展到存在多个不直接相互影响但都受到暴露引起的中介-结局混杂因素影响的中介的情况。我们提供了一个有动机的例子,并根据我们在巴西 1982 年佩洛塔斯出生队列的牙科流行病学工作进行了模拟研究,结果基于我们的工作。