Suppr超能文献

我们是否过于仓促?基于光纤尖端准备差异的激光碎石术表现。

Are We Cutting Ourselves Short? Laser Lithotripsy Performance Based on Differences in Fiber-tip Preparation.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, MI.

出版信息

Urology. 2019 Dec;134:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.027. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the impact of laser fiber-tip configuration on lithotripsy performance, we undertook an in vitro study comparing 3 fiber-tip configurations: (1) new (single-use), (2) cleaved (reusable), and (3) coated (cut with scissors).

METHODS

Lithotripsy was performed using a Ho:YAG laser utilizing fragmentation (1 J × 10 Hz) and dusting (0.5 J × 20 Hz) settings. BegoStones were fragmented with a laser fiber advancing at a speed of 1 mm/s (220 seconds of activation). Three fiber-tip configurations were tested: new single-use standard (242 μm core) and cleaved (272 μm core), compared to the same fiber-tip coated/cut flush with scissors, respectively. Study outcome was difference in stone mass before and after each experiment. Power output was measured using a power meter.

RESULTS

Fragmentation for new or cleaved fibers was greater than the coated/cut flush fiber-tip (P <.05). For 1 J × 10 Hz and 0.5 J × 20 Hz settings, fragmentation was 59% and 75% higher with new fiber-tip compared to the coated/cut flush fiber-tip, respectively. For 1J × 10 Hz and 0.5 J × 20 Hz settings, fragmentation was 51% and 45% higher with cleaved fiber-tip compared to the coated/cut flush fiber-tip, respectively. Power output at the end of laser activation was higher for new and cleaved fiber-tips.

CONCLUSION

New and cleaved laser fibers demonstrated superior lithotripsy performance compared to fibers that were coated/cut flush with scissors. Cutting single-use laser fibers risks damaging the fiber-tip which can disperse the energy and reduce lithotripsy efficiency.

摘要

目的

为了更好地了解激光光纤尖端构型对碎石性能的影响,我们进行了一项体外研究,比较了 3 种光纤尖端构型:(1)新的(一次性使用)、(2)劈开的(可重复使用)和(3)涂层的(用剪刀切割)。

方法

使用 Ho:YAG 激光进行碎石,采用粉碎(1 J×10 Hz)和扬尘(0.5 J×20 Hz)设置。用激光光纤以 1 mm/s 的速度推进(220 秒激活)将 BegoStone 粉碎。测试了 3 种光纤尖端构型:新的一次性标准(242 µm 芯)和劈开的(272 µm 芯),分别与用剪刀切割的相同光纤尖端涂层/平齐进行比较。研究结果是每个实验前后结石质量的差异。使用功率计测量功率输出。

结果

新光纤或劈开光纤的粉碎效果大于涂层/平齐切割光纤尖端(P<.05)。对于 1 J×10 Hz 和 0.5 J×20 Hz 设置,新光纤尖端的粉碎效果分别比涂层/平齐切割光纤尖端高 59%和 75%。对于 1 J×10 Hz 和 0.5 J×20 Hz 设置,劈开光纤尖端的粉碎效果分别比涂层/平齐切割光纤尖端高 51%和 45%。激光激活结束时,新光纤和劈开光纤的功率输出较高。

结论

与用剪刀切割平齐的光纤相比,新光纤和劈开光纤的碎石性能更优。切割一次性使用的激光光纤可能会损坏光纤尖端,从而分散能量并降低碎石效率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验