Department of Orthopedics, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).
Department of Orthopedics, Ningjin County Hospital of Hebei Province, Xingtai, Hebei, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Sep 3;25:6598-6604. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915824.
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of distal radius fractures (DRFs) malalignment on the treatment outcomes in patients over age 65 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records on fresh DRFs treated with closed reduction from December 2014 to January 2018. After treatment, patients were evaluated for the determination of grip strength, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during wrist movement, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, the appearance satisfaction, and active wrist range of motion (ROM). RESULTS A total of 96 patients with complete data were included in our study. During follow-up, there were 75 patients (78.1%) with acceptable reduction and 21 patients (21.9%) with unacceptable reduction. Compared with those having acceptable alignment in the distal radius, patients with unacceptable alignment had weak grip strength, were unsatisfied appearance, and had severe flexion as well as ulnar deviation limitation at 6-month follow-up. A significant correlation was found between ulnar positive variance and grip strength (r=-0.35, P=0.03), as well as dorsal angulation and flexion movement (r=-0.31, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Conservative treatment should be used differently, even in elderly patients. For low-demand patients, it is not necessary to restore all anatomic radiographic parameters, as malalignment does not increase disability or pain score. However, for patients who are still healthy and active, satisfactory reduction is the first choice, as malalignment can lead to decreased grip strength, dissatisfaction with appearance, and certain wrist limitations.
本研究旨在评估桡骨远端骨折(DRF)对线不良对 65 岁以上患者治疗效果的影响。
我们回顾性分析了 2014 年 12 月至 2018 年 1 月接受闭合复位治疗的新鲜 DRF 患者的病历。治疗后,通过握力、腕关节活动时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、患者腕关节评分(PRWE)、上肢功能障碍问卷(DASH)评分、外观满意度以及主动腕关节活动度(ROM)来评估患者的治疗效果。
本研究共纳入 96 例资料完整的患者。随访期间,75 例(78.1%)患者的复位结果可接受,21 例(21.9%)患者的复位结果不可接受。与桡骨远端对线可接受的患者相比,对线不可接受的患者握力较弱,对外观不满意,且在 6 个月随访时存在严重的掌屈和尺偏受限。尺偏正方差与握力呈显著负相关(r=-0.35,P=0.03),背侧成角与掌屈运动呈显著负相关(r=-0.31,P=0.02)。
即使在老年患者中,保守治疗的方法也应有所不同。对于低需求患者,不一定需要恢复所有解剖影像学参数,因为对线不良不会增加残疾或疼痛评分。然而,对于仍健康活跃的患者,满意的复位是首选,因为对线不良会导致握力下降、外观不满意和一定程度的腕关节活动受限。