Suppr超能文献

硝苯地平与普萘洛尔治疗老年不稳定型心绞痛的对比

Nifedipine versus propranolol treatment for unstable angina in the elderly.

作者信息

Myers M G, Baigrie R S, Dubbin J D

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 1988 Nov-Dec;4(8):402-6.

PMID:3147809
Abstract

The effectiveness of nifedipine versus propranolol monotherapy in the treatment of unstable angina in the elderly was evaluated in 26 patients over age 65 years. The study utilized a randomized, parallel design with double-blind primary outcome measurements. Subjects (mean, 76 +/- 2 years) were allocated to nifedipine (n = 12) 10, 20 and 30 mg tid or propranolol (n = 14) 20, 40 and 80 mg tid with the dose increased at 24 to 72 h intervals if tolerated. Maintenance therapy was continued for three months. Unstable angina or myocardial infarction occurred in seven of 12 nifedipine patients versus two of 14 patients on propranolol (P = 0.025). The drugs were similar with respect to daily nitroglycerin use, treadmill walking time and left ventricular ejection fraction. Drug intolerance occurred in two patients on nifedipine and four on propranolol. Propranolol, if tolerated, appears to be more effective than nifedipine in preventing recurrent unstable angina or myocardial infarction in elderly patients.

摘要

对26名65岁以上的患者评估了硝苯地平与普萘洛尔单一疗法治疗老年不稳定型心绞痛的有效性。该研究采用随机、平行设计,并进行双盲主要结局测量。受试者(平均年龄76±2岁)被分配至硝苯地平组(n = 12),每日三次服用10、20和30毫克,或普萘洛尔组(n = 14),每日三次服用20、40和80毫克,若耐受则每隔24至72小时增加剂量。维持治疗持续三个月。12名硝苯地平组患者中有7人发生不稳定型心绞痛或心肌梗死,而普萘洛尔组14名患者中有2人发生(P = 0.025)。在每日硝酸甘油用量、平板运动时间和左心室射血分数方面,两种药物相似。硝苯地平组有2名患者出现药物不耐受,普萘洛尔组有4名患者出现。如果耐受,普萘洛尔在预防老年患者复发性不稳定型心绞痛或心肌梗死方面似乎比硝苯地平更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验