Maresta A, Marzocchi A, Capucci A, Galiè N, Marrozzini C, Magnani B
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1986;6(4):291-301.
A randomized trial was performed in 22 patients with unstable angina to compare the efficacy of oral verapamil with nifedipine in reducing symptomatic ischaemic episodes. The trial consisted of a 48 h control period, a 96 h treatment period with nifedipine (20 mg every 6 h) or verapamil (120 mg every 6 h), and a follow-up period. Patients who had a minimum of four symptomatic ischaemic episodes during the control period were entered into the trial. Asymptomatic ischaemic episodes were evaluated by Holter monitoring. Coronary angiography was performed at the end of the treatment period. Both nifedipine and verapamil significantly reduced the mean number of daily symptomatic ischaemic episodes (p less than 0.01) and the total number of ischaemic episodes (p less than 0.03). This study confirmed the high degree of efficacy of both nifedipine and verapamil in reducing the number of ischaemic episodes during short-term treatment of unstable angina. Nevertheless, a significant number of myocardial infarctions occurred in these patients, and some required subsequent coronary bypass graft operations.
对22例不稳定型心绞痛患者进行了一项随机试验,以比较口服维拉帕米和硝苯地平在减少症状性缺血发作方面的疗效。该试验包括一个48小时的对照期、一个96小时的治疗期(使用硝苯地平(每6小时20毫克)或维拉帕米(每6小时120毫克))以及一个随访期。在对照期内至少有四次症状性缺血发作的患者被纳入试验。无症状性缺血发作通过动态心电图监测进行评估。在治疗期结束时进行冠状动脉造影。硝苯地平和维拉帕米均显著减少了每日症状性缺血发作的平均次数(p<0.01)和缺血发作的总数(p<0.03)。这项研究证实了硝苯地平和维拉帕米在不稳定型心绞痛短期治疗中减少缺血发作次数方面的高度疗效。然而,这些患者中发生了大量心肌梗死,一些患者随后需要进行冠状动脉搭桥手术。