Suppr超能文献

高强度激光治疗在疼痛性跟骨刺管理中的作用:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

The effect of high intensity laser therapy in the management of painful calcaneal spur: a double blind, placebo-controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Jun;35(4):841-852. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02870-w. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) in patients with calcaneal spur. The patients were randomized to receive either HILT + exercise (n = 21) (five times a week for a period of 3 weeks) or placebo HILT + exercise (n = 21) (five times a week for a period of 3 weeks). Pain severity (with visual analog scale (VAS) and with Roles and Maudsley score (RMS)), functionality (with Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)), plantar pressure measurement, and quality of life (with short form-36 (SF-36)) of the patients were evaluated at baseline, at 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. A significant improvement in the VAS (p < 0.001), RMS (p < 0.001), and most of the SF-36 subgroup scores (p < 0.05) and most of the FAOS subgroup scores (p < 0.05) at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment was achieved in both groups. Besides, there was no significant difference in VAS (p > 0.05) and RMS (p > 0.05) between the groups. FAOS symptoms (p = 0.022) and quality of life (p = 0.038) subgroups were higher in the placebo group at 12 weeks. Significant improvements were observed in dynamic pedographic measurements in the HILT group (p < 0.05), and dynamic measurement values were significantly higher in the HILT group compared to placebo group (p < 0.05). Although the evaluation parameters, except dynamic pedographic measurements, have improved in both groups, our study results showed no superiority of HILT over placebo. To conclude, when the main complaint is pain in patients, only exercise therapy can be an economical, practical, and reliable treatment.

摘要

为了评估高强度激光疗法(HILT)在跟骨骨刺患者中的疗效。将患者随机分为接受 HILT+运动治疗组(n=21)(每周 5 次,持续 3 周)或安慰剂 HILT+运动治疗组(n=21)(每周 5 次,持续 3 周)。在基线、4 周和 12 周时,评估患者的疼痛严重程度(采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Roles 和 Maudsley 评分(RMS))、功能(采用足踝结局评分(FAOS))、足底压力测量和生活质量(采用 36 项简短健康调查(SF-36))。两组患者在治疗后 4 周和 12 周时 VAS(p<0.001)、RMS(p<0.001)和大多数 SF-36 亚组评分(p<0.05)和大多数 FAOS 亚组评分(p<0.05)均显著改善。此外,两组间 VAS(p>0.05)和 RMS(p>0.05)无显著差异。12 周时,安慰剂组 FAOS 症状(p=0.022)和生活质量(p=0.038)亚组评分较高。HILT 组动态足底压力测量有显著改善(p<0.05),且与安慰剂组相比,HILT 组动态测量值显著更高(p<0.05)。尽管两组的评估参数(除动态足底压力测量外)均有所改善,但本研究结果并未显示 HILT 优于安慰剂。总之,当患者的主要主诉是疼痛时,仅运动疗法就是一种经济、实用且可靠的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验