Suppr超能文献

已有机械二尖瓣假体患者的经导管主动脉瓣植入术。

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Pre-Existing Mechanical Mitral Valve Prostheses.

作者信息

Scholtz Smita, Piper Cornelia, Horstkotte Dieter, Furukawa Nobuyuki, Börgermann Jochen, Gummert Jan, Rudolph Tanja K, Rudolph Volker, Scholtz Werner

机构信息

Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Georgstr. 11, D-32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Sep;31(9):260-264.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become standard therapy for aortic stenosis patients with intermediate or high operative risk. Treatment of patients with pre-existing mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) is challenging due to possible interference between the TAVI prosthesis and MVR. We present our single-center experience with this special patient cohort.

METHODS

A total of 1960 patients underwent TAVI at our institution between 2009 and March 2018; of these, 16 patients had pre-existing mechanical MVR. Device success and adverse events were analyzed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria. Patients were followed for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 81.5 ± 4.4 years. The patients had a mean logistic EuroScore of 37.1 ± 13.5% and STS score of 7.1 ± 3.2%. Successful valve deployment was achieved in all patients, peri-interventional stroke rate was 0.0%, and permanent pacemaker was implanted in 2 patients (12.5%). Two patients experienced major complications, with blockage of the MVR disc in 1 patient and annulus rupture in 1 patient. Hence, 30-day mortality was 12.5% and 1-year mortality was 25.0%.

CONCLUSION

TAVI in patients with mechanical MVR is challenging and requires careful preparation and choice of TAVI device. Repositionable and retrievable devices seem to be a safer option.

摘要

目的

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为手术风险中或高的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的标准治疗方法。对于已有机械二尖瓣置换术(MVR)的患者进行治疗具有挑战性,因为TAVI假体与MVR之间可能存在干扰。我们介绍了我们在这一特殊患者群体中的单中心经验。

方法

2009年至2018年3月期间,共有1960例患者在我们机构接受了TAVI;其中,16例患者已有机械MVR。根据瓣膜学术研究联盟(VARC)-2标准分析手术成功率和不良事件。对患者进行至少12个月的随访。

结果

患者平均年龄为81.5±4.4岁。患者的平均逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroScore)评分为37.1±13.5%,胸外科医师协会(STS)评分为7.1±3.2%。所有患者均成功植入瓣膜,围手术期卒中发生率为0.0%,2例患者(12.5%)植入了永久性起搏器。2例患者出现严重并发症,1例患者MVR瓣片阻塞,1例患者瓣环破裂。因此,30天死亡率为12.5%,1年死亡率为25.0%。

结论

对已有机械MVR的患者进行TAVI具有挑战性,需要仔细准备并选择TAVI设备。可重新定位和可回收的设备似乎是更安全的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验