• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Genetic analysis of larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster.

作者信息

de Miranda J R, Eggleston P

机构信息

Department of Genetics, University of Liverpool.

出版信息

Heredity (Edinb). 1988 Dec;61 ( Pt 3):339-46. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.124.

DOI:10.1038/hdy.1988.124
PMID:3147977
Abstract

A chromosome assay was employed to determine the genetic basis of the competitive ability of the larvae of Drosophila melanogaster when competing for a controlled amount of food. The effects of increasing stress due to intra- and inter-genotypic competition were analysed using a yield-density regression analysis producing estimates of the absolute performance at a standard reference density (e-values), the magnitude of intra-genotypic competition and the inter-genotypic competitive effect of one genotype on another. A distinction was made between the Sensitivity and the Pressure components of inter-genotypic competition. The probability of survival and mean adult weight were used as measures of competitive success. The genetic analysis revealed high levels of heterosis for the e-values and inter-genotypic pressure, with correspondingly high inter-chromosomal interactions. Inter-genotypic sensitivity was less consistently heterotic and less epistatic. All dominance was directed towards a competitively superior genotype and both major autosomes were involved in the determination of competitive ability with the greater effect residing on the third chromosome. There was evidence of early non-competitive larval mortality in one of the two sets of substitution lines investigated and the effect of this on the estimation of the genetic parameters is discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Genetic analysis of larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster.
Heredity (Edinb). 1988 Dec;61 ( Pt 3):339-46. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.124.
2
The biometrical genetics of competitive parameters in Drosophila melanogaster.黑腹果蝇竞争参数的生物统计学遗传学
Heredity (Edinb). 1990 Apr;64 ( Pt 2):223-31. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1990.27.
3
Analysis of dominance for competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.
Heredity (Edinb). 1989 Oct;63 ( Pt 2):221-9. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1989.95.
4
Analysis of competitive interactions in triocultures of Drosophila melanogaster.
Heredity (Edinb). 1990 Apr;64 ( Pt 2):215-22. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1990.26.
5
Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate.黑腹果蝇幼虫竞争能力增强的进化,而幼虫摄食率并未提高。
J Genet. 2016 Sep;95(3):491-503. doi: 10.1007/s12041-016-0656-8.
6
Competition and genotypic variability in Drosophila melanogaster.黑腹果蝇的竞争与基因型变异性
Heredity (Edinb). 1988 Feb;60 ( Pt 1):119-23. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.17.
7
A predominant role of genotypic variation in both expression of sperm competition genes and paternity success in .在 中,基因型变异在精子竞争基因的表达和父权成功中都起着主要作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Sep 27;290(2007):20231715. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1715. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
8
Larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Comparing biological and competitive parameters.黑腹果蝇幼虫的竞争。II. 生物学参数与竞争参数的比较
Heredity (Edinb). 1988 Apr;60 ( Pt 2):213-9. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.34.
9
Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic variation for interference through media conditioning.黑腹果蝇中的竞争相互作用:通过培养基条件化产生干扰的遗传变异
Heredity (Edinb). 1988 Dec;61 ( Pt 3):347-54. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.125.
10
Larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Estimation of larval growth parameters.黑腹果蝇幼虫的竞争。I. 幼虫生长参数的估计
Heredity (Edinb). 1988 Apr;60 ( Pt 2):205-12. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.33.

引用本文的文献

1
Mitochondrial DNA maintenance in Drosophila melanogaster.果蝇中线粒体 DNA 的维持。
Biosci Rep. 2022 Nov 30;42(11). doi: 10.1042/BSR20211693.