Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Departments of Chemistry and Immunology and Microbial Science, Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, Worm Institute for Research and Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107501. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
One emerging strategy to address the opioid crisis includes opioid-targeted immunopharmacotherapies. This study compared effectiveness of a heroin-tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugate vaccine to antagonize heroin, 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), morphine, and fentanyl antinociception in rats.
Adult male and female Sprague Dawley rats received three doses of active or control vaccine at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Vaccine pharmacological selectivity was assessed by comparing opioid dose-effect curves in 50 °C warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure before and after active or control heroin-TT vaccine. Route of heroin administration [subcutaneous (SC) vs. intravenous [IV)] was also examined as a determinant of vaccine effectiveness. Continuous naltrexone treatment (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) effects on heroin, 6-AM, and morphine antinociceptive potency were also determined as a benchmark for minimal vaccine effectiveness.
The heroin-TT vaccine decreased potency of SC heroin (5-fold), IV heroin (3-fold), and IV 6-AM (3-fold) for several weeks without affecting IV morphine or SC and IV fentanyl potency. The control vaccine did not alter potency of any opioid. Naltrexone dose-dependently decreased antinociceptive potency of SC heroin, and treatment with 0.01 mg/kg/h naltrexone produced similar, approximate 8-fold decreases in potencies of SC and IV heroin, IV 6-AM, and IV morphine. The combination of naltrexone and active vaccine was more effective than naltrexone alone to antagonize SC heroin but not IV heroin.
The heroin-TT vaccine formulation examined is less effective, but more selective, than chronic naltrexone to attenuate heroin antinociception in rats. Furthermore, these results provide an empirical framework for future preclinical opioid vaccine research to benchmark effectiveness against naltrexone.
应对阿片类药物危机的一种新兴策略包括针对阿片类药物的免疫药理学疗法。本研究比较了海洛因-破伤风类毒素(TT)缀合物疫苗对抗海洛因、6-乙酰吗啡(6-AM)、吗啡和芬太尼镇痛作用的效果,该疫苗在大鼠体内的作用。
成年雄性和雌性 Sprague Dawley 大鼠在 0、2 和 4 周时接受三剂主动或对照疫苗。通过比较主动或对照海洛因-TT 疫苗前后 50°C 热水尾巴撤退程序中的阿片类药物剂量-效应曲线,评估疫苗的药理学选择性。还研究了海洛因给药途径(皮下[SC]与静脉内[IV])作为疫苗有效性的决定因素。还确定了持续给予纳曲酮(0.0032-0.032mg/kg/h)对海洛因、6-AM 和吗啡镇痛效力的影响,作为疫苗最低有效性的基准。
海洛因-TT 疫苗使 SC 海洛因(5 倍)、IV 海洛因(3 倍)和 IV 6-AM(3 倍)的效力降低了数周,而不影响 IV 吗啡或 SC 和 IV 芬太尼的效力。对照疫苗未改变任何阿片类药物的效力。纳曲酮剂量依赖性地降低了 SC 海洛因的镇痛效力,而用 0.01mg/kg/h 纳曲酮治疗产生了类似的,大约 8 倍降低了 SC 和 IV 海洛因、IV 6-AM 和 IV 吗啡的效力。纳曲酮和主动疫苗的组合比纳曲酮单独更有效地拮抗 SC 海洛因,但不能拮抗 IV 海洛因。
在所检查的海洛因-TT 疫苗配方中,与慢性纳曲酮相比,其降低海洛因镇痛作用的效果较低,但选择性较高。此外,这些结果为未来的临床前阿片类药物疫苗研究提供了一个基准框架,以评估对纳曲酮的有效性。