Iqbal Asif, Choi Tae-Jeong, Kim You-Sam, Lee Yun-Mi, Zahangir Alam M, Jung Jong-Hyun, Choe Ho-Sung, Kim Jong-Joo
Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 Nov;32(11):1657-1663. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0672. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
A genome-based best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method was applied to evaluate accuracies of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) of carcass and reproductive traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korean swine breeding farms.
The data comprised a total of 1,870, 696, and 1,723 genotyped pigs belonging to Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire breeds, respectively. Reference populations for carcass traits consisted of 888 Berkshire, 466 Duroc, and 1,208 Yorkshire pigs, and those for reproductive traits comprised 210, 154, and 890 dams for the respective breeds. The carcass traits analyzed were backfat thickness (BFT) and carcass weight (CWT), and the reproductive traits were total number born (TNB) and number born alive (NBA). For each trait, GEBV accuracies were evaluated with a GEBV BLUP model and realized GEBVs.
The accuracies under the GBLUP model for BFT and CWT ranged from 0.33-0.72 and 0.33-0.63, respectively. For NBA and TNB, the model accuracies ranged 0.32 to 0.54 and 0.39 to 0.56, respectively. The realized accuracy estimates for BFT and CWT ranged 0.30 to 0.46 and 0.09 to 0.27, respectively, and 0.50 to 0.70 and 0.70 to 0.87 for NBA and TNB, respectively. For the carcass traits, the GEBV accuracies under the GBLUP model were higher than the realized GEBV accuracies across the breed populations, while for reproductive traits the realized accuracies were higher than the model based GEBV accuracies.
The genomic prediction accuracy increased with reference population size and heritability of the trait. The GEBV accuracies were also influenced by GEBV estimation method, such that careful selection of animals based on the estimated GEBVs is needed. GEBV accuracy will increase with a larger sized reference population, which would be more beneficial for traits with low heritability such as reproductive traits.
应用基于基因组的最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)方法评估韩国养猪场中伯克夏猪、杜洛克猪和约克夏猪群体胴体和繁殖性状的基因组估计育种值(GEBV)准确性。
数据分别包括1870头、696头和1723头已基因分型的伯克夏猪、杜洛克猪和约克夏猪。胴体性状的参考群体由888头伯克夏猪、466头杜洛克猪和1208头约克夏猪组成,繁殖性状的参考群体分别由210头、154头和890头各品种母猪组成。分析的胴体性状为背膘厚度(BFT)和胴体重(CWT),繁殖性状为总产仔数(TNB)和产活仔数(NBA)。对于每个性状,使用GEBV BLUP模型和实现的GEBV评估GEBV准确性。
GBLUP模型下BFT和CWT的准确性分别为0.33 - 0.72和0.33 - 0.63。对于NBA和TNB,模型准确性分别为0.32至0.54和0.39至0.56。BFT和CWT的实现准确性估计分别为0.30至0.46和0.09至0.27,NBA和TNB分别为0.50至0.70和0.70至0.87。对于胴体性状,GBLUP模型下的GEBV准确性高于各品种群体中实现的GEBV准确性,而对于繁殖性状,实现的准确性高于基于模型的GEBV准确性。
基因组预测准确性随参考群体大小和性状遗传力增加。GEBV准确性也受GEBV估计方法影响,因此需要根据估计的GEBV仔细选择动物。更大规模的参考群体将提高GEBV准确性,这对繁殖性状等低遗传力性状更有益。