School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Sep 3;14(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1365-2.
The prognosis of N categories for patients with non-surgical esophageal carcinoma based on the number of metastatic lymph nodes is controversial. The present study analyzes prognostic implications of the number, extent, and size of metastatic lymph nodes for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy to provide more information on treatment strategy.
We reviewed 357 ESCC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy between January 2013 and March 2016 retrospectively. We assessed potential associations between the involved extent (N0, 1 region, 2 regions, and 3 regions), number (N0, 1-2, 3-6, and ≥ 7), and size (N0, ≤2 cm, and > 2 cm) of metastatic lymph nodes and overall survival. Multivariate analyses of the clinicopathological factors were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model.
5-year survival rates were 43.6% for patients in the N0 group and 29.3% in the N+ group (p = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analyses for all cases revealed that there were significant differences in survival based on the extent (the OS rates at 3 years were 53.3% for patients in the N0 group, 45.7% in the 1 region-involved group, 28.0% in the 2 regions-involved group, and 13.3% in the 3 regions-involved group, P < 0.001), number (the OS rates at 3 years were 49.0% for patients in the 1-2 LNs group, 27.8% in the 3-6 LNs group, 0 in the ≥7LNs group, P < 0.001), and size (the OS rates at 3 years were 41.6% for patients in the LNs ≤2 cm group and 20.7% in the LNs > 2 cm group, P = 0.001) of metastatic LNs. One hundred seventy-two patients (48.2%) had experienced GTV failure, 157 (43.1%) had distant failure, 49 (13.7%) had out-of-GTV nodal failure, and 70 patients (19.6%) had no evidence of disease at the last follow-up. Nodal status correlated statistically with GTV failure. Patients with LN metastases in the abdominal region had worse survival rates than those with metastases in the other regions. The extent and number of metastatic LNs, T category, Primary tumor location, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of OS in multivariate analyses.
For patients with ESCC who received definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy, the number, extent, and size of metastatic LNs were prognostic factors, particularly of the T2/3 disease. Patients with LN metastases in the abdominal region had worse survival.
基于转移淋巴结数量的 N 分期对非手术食管癌患者的预后存在争议。本研究分析了转移淋巴结的数量、范围和大小对接受根治性(放化疗)治疗的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的预后影响,旨在为治疗策略提供更多信息。
我们回顾性分析了 2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月期间接受根治性放疗的 357 例 ESCC 患者。我们评估了转移淋巴结受累范围(N0、1 个区域、2 个区域和 3 个区域)、数量(N0、1-2、3-6 和≥7)和大小(N0、≤2cm 和>2cm)与总生存之间的潜在关联。使用 Cox 比例风险模型对临床病理因素进行多变量分析。
N0 组患者的 5 年生存率为 43.6%,N+组为 29.3%(p=0.001)。所有病例的 Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,生存存在显著差异,具体表现在受累范围(N0 组患者的 3 年 OS 率为 53.3%,1 个区域受累组为 45.7%,2 个区域受累组为 28.0%,3 个区域受累组为 13.3%,P<0.001)、数量(N0 组患者的 3 年 OS 率为 1-2 个淋巴结组为 49.0%,3-6 个淋巴结组为 27.8%,≥7 个淋巴结组为 0%,P<0.001)和大小(N0 组患者的 3 年 OS 率为 LNs≤2cm 组为 41.6%,LNs>2cm 组为 20.7%,P=0.001)。172 例患者(48.2%)发生了 GTV 失败,157 例(43.1%)发生了远处失败,49 例(13.7%)发生了 GTV 外淋巴结失败,70 例(19.6%)在最后一次随访时无疾病证据。淋巴结状态与 GTV 失败具有统计学相关性。腹部淋巴结转移的患者生存率低于其他部位转移的患者。多变量分析显示,淋巴结转移、T 分期、原发肿瘤位置和化疗是 OS 的独立预后因素。
对于接受根治性(放化疗)治疗的 ESCC 患者,转移淋巴结的数量、范围和大小是预后因素,尤其是 T2/3 疾病患者。腹部淋巴结转移的患者生存较差。