Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nihon University Hospital, 1-6 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8309, Japan.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Sep 3;14(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1348-x.
Therapeutic intervention has recently been actively performed for metastatic spine tumor even though spinal cord paralysis is not clearly observed, but there has been no report in which the degree of spinal cord compression by tumor was taken into consideration for the paralysis-preventing effect of treatment. Thus, we investigated the neurological outcome after treatment of patients with spinal cord compression in a state of impending paralysis.
A retrospective cohort study. The subjects were 88 patients with epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) scale 1b or severer compression with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) E spinal metastasis. The neurological outcome after the therapeutic intervention was investigated at regular intervals until death. The therapeutic intervention was posterior decompression and stabilization in 18 patients, stabilization without posterior decompression in 15, and radiotherapy in 55 patients (3 groups).
The ASIA aggravation group was comprised of 15 patients, and the severity of paralysis was ASIA A in 3, B in 3, C in 6, and D in 3. Paralysis appeared in 16.7% in the posterior decompression and stabilization group, 13.3% in the posterior stabilization without decompression group, and 18.8% in the radiotherapy group. In the transverse view, the incidence was high in cases with advancement to the intervertebral foramen and circumferential-type advancement, and paralysis developed in more than 20% of ESCC 1c or severer cases. Factors influencing neurological aggravation were investigated, but there was no significant factor.
In ESCC 1b or severer cases with ASIA E spinal metastasis, paralysis aggravated after therapeutic intervention in 16.7% in the posterior decompression and stabilization group, 13.3% in the stabilization without decompression group, and 16.7% in the radiotherapy group. There was no significant factor influencing the development of paralysis.
即使没有明显观察到脊髓瘫痪,最近也积极对转移脊柱肿瘤进行治疗干预,但尚无报告考虑肿瘤对脊髓的压迫程度对治疗预防瘫痪的效果。因此,我们研究了即将发生瘫痪的脊髓压迫患者在治疗后的神经学结局。
这是一项回顾性队列研究。研究对象为 88 例硬膜外脊髓压迫(ESCC)评分 1b 或更严重的伴有美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)E 级脊柱转移的患者。定期随访直至死亡,以调查治疗干预后的神经学结局。18 例患者接受了后路减压和稳定术,15 例患者接受了单纯稳定术,55 例患者接受了放疗(3 组)。
ASIA 恶化组有 15 例患者,瘫痪严重程度为 ASIA A 级 3 例,B 级 3 例,C 级 6 例,D 级 3 例。后路减压和稳定组、后路单纯稳定组和放疗组的瘫痪发生率分别为 16.7%、13.3%和 18.8%。在横切面上,椎间孔进展和环状进展的发生率较高,ESCC 1c 或更严重的病例中,超过 20%的患者出现瘫痪。研究了影响神经恶化的因素,但没有发现显著的影响因素。
在 ASIA E 级脊柱转移的 ESCC 1b 或更严重的病例中,后路减压和稳定组、单纯稳定组和放疗组的瘫痪恶化率分别为 16.7%、13.3%和 16.7%。没有显著的因素影响瘫痪的发生。