Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e029859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029859.
Clinical guidelines recommend that patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) learn carbohydrate counting or similar methods to improve glycaemic control. Although systematic educating in carbohydrate counting is still not offered as standard-of-care for all patients on multiple daily injections (MDI) insulin therapy in outpatient diabetes clinics in Denmark. This may be due to the lack of evidence as to which educational methods are the most effective for training patients in carbohydrate counting. The objective of this study is to compare the effect of two different educational programmes in carbohydrate counting with the usual dietary care on glycaemic control in patients with T1D.
The study is designed as a randomised controlled trial with a parallel-group design. The total study duration is 12 months with data collection at baseline, 6 and 12 months. We plan to include 231 Danish adult patients with T1D. Participants will be randomised to one of three dietician-led interventions: (1) a programme in basic carbohydrate counting, (2) a programme in advanced carbohydrate counting including an automated bolus calculator or (3) usual dietary care. The primary outcome is changes in glycated haemoglobin A1c or mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions from baseline to end of the intervention period (week 24) between and within each of the three study groups. Other outcome measures include changes in other parameters of plasma glucose variability (eg, time in range), body weight and composition, lipid profile, blood pressure, mathematical literacy skills, carbohydrate estimation accuracy, dietary intake, diet-related quality of life, perceived competencies in dietary management of diabetes and perceptions of an autonomy supportive dietician-led climate, physical activity and urinary biomarkers.
The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark. Study findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03623113).
临床指南建议 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者学习碳水化合物计数或类似方法以改善血糖控制。尽管在丹麦的门诊糖尿病诊所中,对于接受多次每日胰岛素注射(MDI)治疗的患者,系统地进行碳水化合物计数教育仍然不是标准的护理方法。这可能是由于缺乏证据表明哪种教育方法对于培训患者进行碳水化合物计数最有效。本研究的目的是比较两种不同的碳水化合物计数教育方案与常规饮食护理对 T1D 患者血糖控制的影响。
该研究设计为随机对照试验,采用平行组设计。总研究持续时间为 12 个月,在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时进行数据收集。我们计划纳入 231 名丹麦成年 T1D 患者。参与者将随机分配到以下三种营养师主导的干预措施之一:(1)基础碳水化合物计数方案,(2)包括自动推注计算器的高级碳水化合物计数方案,或(3)常规饮食护理。主要结局是从基线到干预结束(第 24 周)期间,三组研究之间和之内糖化血红蛋白 A1c 或血糖波动幅度均值的变化。其他结局指标包括其他血糖变异性参数(例如,血糖达标时间)、体重和成分、血脂谱、血压、数学素养技能、碳水化合物估计准确性、饮食摄入量、与饮食相关的生活质量、对糖尿病饮食管理的感知能力和对自主支持性营养师主导的气候的感知的变化,以及体力活动和尿生物标志物。
该方案已获得丹麦首都大区哥本哈根伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将通过同行评审的出版物和会议演讲广泛传播。
ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT03623113)。