Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department of the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Vasco de Quiróga #15, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14000, Mexico City, Mexico.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3037-3042. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07100-6. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
The pre-colonoscopy diet traditionally involves 24 h of a clear liquid diet (CLD) in combination with a lavage solution; however, this preparation is poorly tolerated.
To compare the impact on the quality of bowel cleansing and tolerability of a CLD versus a low-residue diet (LRD).
We performed a randomized trial. Subjects were randomized to CLD or LRD the day before of elective colonoscopy. All subjects received a 4-L preparation of single-dose PEG beginning 16 h prior to colonoscopy. The Boston bowel preparation scale was used to evaluate bowel cleansing; an adequate-quality preparation was defined as a score ≥ 2 per segment.
A total of 205 subjects were included with a mean age (SD) of 55.6 (12.6) years; 133 (64.9%) of them were female. A total of 105 subjects were randomized to receive CLD and 100 to LRD. No significant differences in bowel preparation quality were observed between groups according to the section of colon: right colon (70% vs. 73%, p = 0.08), transverse colon (82% vs. 79%, p = 0.062), or left colon (80% vs. 78.7%, p = 0.28). There was a tendency toward less-frequent nausea (p = 0.08) and vomiting (p = 0.07) in patients with LRD. No differences between groups regarding ADR (12% vs. 10%) were noted.
An LRD before colonoscopy resulted in a tendency toward improved tolerability by patients, with no differences in the quality of bowel preparation.
传统的结肠镜检查前饮食包括 24 小时的清流质饮食(CLD)与灌洗液联合应用,但这种准备方法耐受性较差。
比较 CLD 与低残留饮食(LRD)对肠道清洁质量和耐受性的影响。
我们进行了一项随机试验。受试者在择期结肠镜检查前一天随机分为 CLD 组或 LRD 组。所有受试者在结肠镜检查前 16 小时开始服用 4L 的单剂量 PEG 准备。采用波士顿肠道准备量表评估肠道清洁度;每个肠段的评分≥2 分定义为充分清洁。
共纳入 205 例患者,平均年龄(SD)为 55.6(12.6)岁;133 例(64.9%)为女性。105 例受试者随机接受 CLD,100 例接受 LRD。根据结肠节段,两组间肠道准备质量无显著差异:右半结肠(70% vs. 73%,p=0.08)、横结肠(82% vs. 79%,p=0.062)或左半结肠(80% vs. 78.7%,p=0.28)。LRD 组患者恶心(p=0.08)和呕吐(p=0.07)的频率较低,但差异无统计学意义。两组间 ADR(12% vs. 10%)无差异。
LRD 用于结肠镜检查前可改善患者的耐受性,且肠道准备质量无差异。