Department of Endoscopy, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Dig Endosc. 2014 Nov;26(6):731-6. doi: 10.1111/den.12265. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a low-volume (2-L) polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimen for colonoscopy compared to single (4-L) or split-dose (2-L + 2-L) regimens.
In-hospital patients who were candidates for colonoscopy were randomly assigned to: group 1 single-dose (PEG 4 L the day before the study, n = 60); group 2: split-dose (2 L the day before and 2 L on the day of the procedure, n = 61); and group 3: low-volume 2-L PEG solution (the day of the procedure, n = 59). A blinded evaluation of the quality of colonic preparation was assessed by the Boston bowel preparation scale.
Satisfactory bowel preparation of the right colon was more frequently reported for group 3 than for group 1 (70% vs 53%, P = 0.045), in the transverse colon it was 82% versus 69% (P = 0.032), and on the left side of the colon it was 80% versus 67.7% (P = 0.028). Compared to group 2, satisfactory bowel preparation in group 3 was similar in the transverse colon and left colon. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort were less frequent in patients of group 3. Patients in group 3 had fewer sleep disorders and fewer hours of sleep loss compared to patients in the other groups.
Preparation with 2 L caused less abdominal discomfort and fewer sleep disorders. The split dose had a better quality of preparation in the right colon. Both preparations were clearly better than the 4-L preparation.
比较低容量(2 升)聚乙二醇(PEG)方案与单剂量(4 升)或分剂量(2 升+2 升)方案用于结肠镜检查的疗效和耐受性。
在住院患者中,选择适合结肠镜检查的患者,随机分为三组:组 1 单剂量组(PEG 4 升在检查前一天,n=60);组 2:分剂量组(前一天 2 升,检查当天 2 升,n=61);组 3:低容量 2 升 PEG 溶液组(检查当天,n=59)。采用波士顿肠道准备量表对肠道准备质量进行盲法评估。
3 组右侧结肠的肠道准备满意度显著高于 1 组(70% vs 53%,P=0.045),横结肠为 82% vs 69%(P=0.032),左侧结肠为 80% vs 67.7%(P=0.028)。与 2 组相比,3 组的横结肠和左侧结肠肠道准备满意度相似。3 组患者恶心、呕吐和腹部不适的发生率较低。3 组患者睡眠障碍和睡眠时间减少的发生率均低于其他两组。
2 升的准备方案引起的腹部不适和睡眠障碍较少。分剂量组在右半结肠的准备质量更好。这两种方案都明显优于 4 升的方案。