Girianelli Vania Reis, Tomazelli Jeane Glaucia, Nogueira Mário Círio, Corrêa Camila Soares Lima, Souza Eduardo Oliveira de, Gabrielli Ligia, Aquino Estela M L, Guerra Maximiliano Ribeiro, Stavola Bianca Lucia De, Dos-Santos-Silva Isabel, Silva Gulnar Azevedo E
Departamento de Direitos Humanos, Saúde e Diversidade Cultural, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - Campo Grande (MS), Brasil.
Divisão de Detecção Precoce e Apoio a Organização de Rede, Coordenação Geral de Prevenção e Vigilância, Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019 Sep 2;22:e190045. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720190045.
The study assessed interobserver reliability in the classification of record pairs formed during probabilistic linkage of health-related databases, a key step in the methodology validation to be used in a larger on-going study on inequalities in the access to breast and cervical cancer control activities in Brazil (DAAC-SIS).
The RecLink software was used to link two databases of the Breast Cancer Control Information System (SISMAMA) in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil: a reference database, which included 301 screening mammograms with probable benign diagnosis (BI-RADS 3 category) recorded in October 2010, and a database comprising 158,517 mammograms registered in 2011. Subsequently, the 215 pairs of records that were not assigned the maximum RecLink score were independently classified as being true or false by ten independent evaluators from four participating centers.
The Kappa coefficient ranged from 0.87 to 1.00. Six evaluators were in perfect agreement with one or more evaluators from the other centers. The global Kappa was 0.96 (95% confidence interval - 95%CI 0.94 - 0.99).
Assessment of interobserver reliability is key to ensuring the quality of the record linkage, and it should be routine practice in studies of this nature. The disclosure of such results contributes to transparency in the conduct of such studies and in the reporting of their findings.
Interobserver reliability in this study was excellent, indicating satisfactory team consistency in the classification of record pairs.
本研究评估了在健康相关数据库概率链接过程中形成的记录对分类中的观察者间可靠性,这是在巴西一项正在进行的关于乳腺癌和宫颈癌控制活动获取不平等问题的更大规模研究(DAAC-SIS)中方法验证的关键步骤。
使用RecLink软件将巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州乳腺癌控制信息系统(SISMAMA)的两个数据库进行链接:一个参考数据库,其中包括2010年10月记录的301例可能为良性诊断(BI-RADS 3类)的乳腺钼靶筛查图像,以及一个包含2011年登记的158,517例乳腺钼靶图像的数据库。随后,未被赋予最高RecLink分数的215对记录由来自四个参与中心的十名独立评估者独立分类为真或假。
Kappa系数范围为0.87至1.00。六名评估者与其他中心的一名或多名评估者完全一致。总体Kappa为0.96(95%置信区间 - 95%CI 0.94 - 0.99)。
评估观察者间可靠性是确保记录链接质量的关键,在这类研究中应作为常规做法。披露此类结果有助于此类研究的开展及其结果报告的透明度。
本研究中的观察者间可靠性极佳,表明在记录对分类方面团队一致性令人满意。