Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Sciences, Jeonju University, South Korea.
Department of Physical Therapy, Sangji University, Wonju, South Korea.
J Athl Train. 2019 Nov;54(11):1149-1155. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-203-18. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Deficient glenohumeral rotational range of motion (ROM) is a risk factor for shoulder pain. Adapted ROM of the trunk and hip in response to loss of glenohumeral ROM has been suggested, as the nature of baseball leads to ROM adaptations.
To compare the bilateral rotational ROM values of the trunk and glenohumeral and hip joints in adolescent baseball players with or without shoulder pain and to measure the correlation between shoulder-pain intensity and bilateral rotational ROM values for each body area.
Cross-sectional study.
Research laboratory.
Ninety-five adolescent baseball players (60 with shoulder pain, 35 without shoulder pain).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Bilateral trunk rotation and internal rotation, external rotation, and total rotation of the dominant and nondominant glenohumeral and hip joints.
Glenohumeral and hip ROM did not differ between groups, and pain intensity and rotational ROM were not related in either joint. Trunk rotational ROM was greater in the pain group than in the control group (dominant side = 48.8° ± 14.2° versus 41.8° ± 11.9°, respectively; nondominant side = 45.1° ± 14.2° versus 38.9° ± 7.7°, respectively; values < .05), although the difference was clinically small (mean differences = 7.0° ± 2.7° [95% confidence interval = 1.7, 12.4] on the dominant side, = .01, and 6.1° ± 2.7° [95% confidence interval = 0.8, 11.5] on the nondominant side, = .03). Positive but low correlations in all players (ρ = 0.27, = .01) and in those with shoulder pain (ρ = 0.36, = .001) were present between shoulder-pain intensity and trunk rotational ROM toward the dominant side.
We found no clinical relationship between shoulder pain and rotational ROM and no clinical differences in rotational ROM values between players with and those without shoulder pain.
肩关节旋转活动度不足是肩部疼痛的一个危险因素。由于棒球运动的性质导致了关节活动度的适应性改变,因此,人们认为躯干和髋关节的适应性旋转活动度会对肩关节旋转活动度的丧失做出反应。
比较有或无肩部疼痛的青少年棒球运动员双侧躯干和肩关节、髋关节的旋转活动度,并测量每个身体区域肩部疼痛强度与双侧旋转活动度值之间的相关性。
横断面研究。
研究实验室。
95 名青少年棒球运动员(60 名有肩部疼痛,35 名无肩部疼痛)。
双侧躯干旋转和优势侧与非优势侧肩关节的内旋、外旋和总旋转,以及髋关节的内旋、外旋和总旋转。
两组间肩关节和髋关节的活动度无差异,且在任何关节中疼痛强度与旋转活动度均无相关性。疼痛组的躯干旋转活动度大于对照组(优势侧=48.8°±14.2°比 41.8°±11.9°,分别;非优势侧=45.1°±14.2°比 38.9°±7.7°,分别;P 值均<.05),尽管差异在临床上较小(优势侧的平均差异=7.0°±2.7°[95%置信区间=1.7,12.4],P 值=.01,非优势侧的平均差异=6.1°±2.7°[95%置信区间=0.8,11.5],P 值=.03)。在所有运动员(ρ=0.27,P 值=.01)和有肩部疼痛的运动员(ρ=0.36,P 值=.001)中,肩部疼痛强度与向优势侧的躯干旋转活动度之间存在正相关,但相关性较低。
我们发现肩部疼痛与旋转活动度之间没有临床相关性,且有肩部疼痛的运动员与无肩部疼痛的运动员之间的旋转活动度值也没有临床差异。