• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔美学筛选指数:一种评估修复牙科中牙颌面美学的新工具。

The dental esthetic screening index: A new tool for assessment of dento-facial esthetics in restorative dentistry.

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental School, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Nov;31(6):572-582. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12522. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1111/jerd.12522
PMID:31483563
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is a lack of comprehensive indexes, which can measure conditions or changes in dento-facial esthetics before and after treatment. Therefore, the 12-item Dental Esthetic Screening Index (DESI) was developed and validated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reliability was tested by five dental professionals, who evaluated 30 standardized patient photographs baseline and after 14 days. Clinical validation was done on 52 patients before and after restorative treatment. For subjective assessment, patients completed a validated questionnaire before and after treatment. Statistical analysis included inter and intrarater reliability, Wilcoxon test and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The single item analysis identified two weak extraoral items (κ = 0.15; κ = -0.05), that were removed from the DESI. After this modification, both inter- (κ = 0.83-0.86) and intrarater reliability (ICC = 0.75-0.86) were in excellent to good agreement. In the clinical validation, the DESI was significantly lower after restorative treatment (P < .0001). The patients' perception questionnaires showed significant improvement after restorative therapy (P < .0001). A correlation of the DESI and the results of patients' perception questionnaires could be assumed (P < .0001; R = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

The DESI was found to be a reliable and valid instrument for the quantitative assessment of dento-facial esthetics. It correlated well with the subjective assessment of the patients.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This comprehensive index would allow for objective quantification of clinical situations, for reliable baseline and outcome assessment in esthetic dentistry. As patients' esthetic feelings and sensations are subjective, this objective index is also proven to be congruent to patients' individual subjective assessment of dento-facial esthetics.

摘要

目的

目前缺乏综合指标来衡量治疗前后牙颌面美观状况或变化,因此开发并验证了 12 项牙科美学筛选指数(DESI)。

材料和方法

通过 5 位牙科专业人员对 30 张标准化患者照片进行评估,对可靠性进行了测试,评估时间分别为基线和 14 天后。对 52 例修复治疗前后的患者进行了临床验证。为了进行主观评估,患者在治疗前后完成了一份经过验证的问卷。统计分析包括组内和组间可靠性、Wilcoxon 检验和线性回归分析。

结果

单项分析确定了两个较弱的口腔外项目(κ=0.15;κ=-0.05),并从 DESI 中删除。经过此修改后,组内(κ=0.83-0.86)和组内可靠性(ICC=0.75-0.86)均为极好至良好的一致性。在临床验证中,修复治疗后 DESI 明显降低(P<.0001)。患者感知问卷显示修复治疗后有显著改善(P<.0001)。可以假设 DESI 与患者感知问卷的结果之间存在相关性(P<.0001;R=0.32)。

结论

DESI 被证明是一种可靠有效的定量评估牙颌面美观的工具。它与患者的主观评估高度相关。

临床意义

该综合指数可以客观量化临床情况,为美学牙科的可靠基线和结果评估提供支持。由于患者的审美感受是主观的,因此该客观指数也被证明与患者对牙颌面美观的个体主观评估一致。

相似文献

1
The dental esthetic screening index: A new tool for assessment of dento-facial esthetics in restorative dentistry.口腔美学筛选指数:一种评估修复牙科中牙颌面美学的新工具。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Nov;31(6):572-582. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12522. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
The assessment of dentofacial esthetics in restorative dentistry: a review of the literature.修复牙科中的牙颌面美学评估:文献综述。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 May;143(5):461-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0205.
3
Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices-Comparative analysis of reliability and validity.采用八项客观指标评估种植体美学效果-可靠性和有效性的对比分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jul;29(7):697-706. doi: 10.1111/clr.13261. Epub 2018 May 27.
4
Digital Smile Design Meets the Dento-Facial Analyzer: Optimizing Esthetics While Preserving Tooth Structure.数字微笑设计与牙面分析仪相结合:在保留牙体结构的同时优化美学效果。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016 Jan;37(1):46-50.
5
Dental esthetic screening index (DESI) scores among patients attending Qassim University dental clinics.卡西姆大学牙科诊所患者的牙齿美学筛查指数(DESI)得分。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Jul;36(7):1031-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 May 1.
6
Perspective of facial esthetics in dental treatment planning.牙科治疗计划中的面部美学视角。
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Feb;75(2):169-76. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90095-5.
7
Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization.粉色美学评分的可重复性——关于牙科观察者专业背景对单颗种植体修复周围软组织美学的评分
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(6):375-84; discussion 385. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00212.x.
8
Perception of Facial Esthetics by Laypersons, Dental Assistants, General Dental Practitioners and Dental Specialists.外行人、牙科助理、普通牙科医生和牙科专家对面部美学的认知。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):304-310.
9
Evaluation of the influence exerted by different dental specialty backgrounds and measuring instrument reproducibility on esthetic aspects of maxillary implant-supported single crown.评估不同牙科专业背景和测量仪器重复性对上颌种植单冠美学方面的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):250-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12532. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
10
Validation of the prosthetic esthetic index.义齿美学指数的验证
Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(5):1447-56. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1109-x. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental esthetic screening index (DESI) scores among patients attending Qassim University dental clinics.卡西姆大学牙科诊所患者的牙齿美学筛查指数(DESI)得分。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Jul;36(7):1031-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Evaluation of different aesthetic indices for planning orthodontic treatment.用于正畸治疗计划的不同美学指标评估。
Bioinformation. 2023 Dec 31;19(13):1394-1398. doi: 10.6026/973206300191394. eCollection 2023.