• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用创伤质量改进计划指标数据提升临床实践。

Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Metrics Data to Enhance Clinical Practice.

作者信息

Blackmore Abigail R, Leonard Jan, Madayag Robert, Bourg Pamela W

机构信息

Trauma Services Department (Ms Blackmore and Drs Madayag and Bourg) and Department of Trauma Research (Mr Leonard), St. Anthony Hospital, Lakewood, Colorado.

出版信息

J Trauma Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;26(3):121-127. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000436.

DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000436
PMID:31483767
Abstract

The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) provides trauma centers with hospital-specific performance data and the ability to compare their performance data with that of similar hospitals nationwide. Utilizing the TQIP data and drill down feature can lead to changes in clinical practice and improved care. The purpose of this article is to provide a guide that demonstrates how using the TQIP hospital-specific data can improve outcomes. We recommend 4 separate categories by which data and reports should be evaluated: processes of care, quality of care, data coding, and data mapping. We discuss these categories using 4 targeted examples. Utilizing our guidelines, trauma programs participating in the TQIP should be able to (1) identify trends and focus on outliers in their institutional data, (2) create processes and implement practice improvements, and (3) evaluate the results of their corrective action plan. This topic may be of special interest to those involved in the management of programs or systems-level policies as reduction in costs and improving quality are program drivers.

摘要

美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目(TQIP)为创伤中心提供特定医院的绩效数据,并使其能够将自身绩效数据与全国范围内类似医院的数据进行比较。利用TQIP数据及深入分析功能可带来临床实践的改变并改善医疗服务。本文旨在提供一份指南,展示如何使用TQIP特定医院数据来改善治疗结果。我们建议从四个不同类别评估数据和报告:护理流程、护理质量、数据编码和数据映射。我们通过四个有针对性的例子来讨论这些类别。遵循我们的指南,参与TQIP的创伤项目应能够:(1)识别机构数据中的趋势并关注异常值;(2)创建流程并实施实践改进;(3)评估其纠正行动计划的结果。由于降低成本和提高质量是项目的驱动因素,因此该主题可能会引起参与项目管理或系统层面政策制定的人员的特别关注。

相似文献

1
Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Metrics Data to Enhance Clinical Practice.利用创伤质量改进计划指标数据提升临床实践。
J Trauma Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;26(3):121-127. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000436.
2
Association of Hospital Participation in a Regional Trauma Quality Improvement Collaborative With Patient Outcomes.医院参与区域创伤质量改进协作与患者结局的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):747-756. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0985.
3
To TQIP or not to TQIP? That is the question.是否采用创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)?这是个问题。
Am Surg. 2014 Apr;80(4):386-90.
4
Trauma Nurse Leads in a Level I Trauma Center: Roles, Responsibilities, and Trauma Performance Improvement Outcomes.一级创伤中心的创伤护士领导:角色、职责与创伤绩效改善成果
J Trauma Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;26(2):99-103. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000431.
5
Early geriatric consultation increases adherence to TQIP Geriatric Trauma Management Guidelines.早期老年病会诊可提高对TQIP老年创伤管理指南的依从性。
J Surg Res. 2017 Aug;216:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
The Trauma Quality Improvement Program: pilot study and initial demonstration of feasibility.创伤质量改进项目:初步研究及可行性的初步论证
J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):253-62. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cfc8e6.
7
Determining the impact of culture on venous thromboembolism prevention in trauma patients: A Southwestern Surgical Congress Multicenter trial.确定文化对创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的影响:西南外科学会多中心试验。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jun;217(6):1030-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
8
Massive transfusion policies at trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.参与美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目的创伤中心的大量输血政策。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jun;78(6 Suppl 1):S48-53. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000641.
9
Trauma Quality Improvement Program: A Retrospective Analysis from A Middle Eastern National Trauma Center.创伤质量改进计划:来自中东一家国家创伤中心的回顾性分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;11(21):2865. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212865.
10
Implications of the Trauma Quality Improvement Project inclusion of nonsurvivable injuries in performance benchmarking.创伤质量改进项目将不可存活损伤纳入绩效基准评估的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Oct;83(4):617-621. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001577.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Severe Sepsis After Blood Product Administration for Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program Study.创伤性出血输血制品后发生严重脓毒症的风险:一项创伤质量改进项目研究
J Surg Res. 2025 Mar;307:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.009. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
Characterising practice patterns of human derived, lyophilized coagulation concentrates within the trauma quality improvement program registry.在创伤质量改进项目登记处中描述人源冻干凝血浓缩物的应用模式。
Transfus Med. 2024 Dec;34(6):520-526. doi: 10.1111/tme.13094. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Characterizing emergency department surgical airway placement in the setting of trauma.
描述创伤环境下急诊科行外科气道建立的特点。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;85:48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.08.032. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
4
Preventability of injury-related morbidity & mortality at four hospitals in Cameroon: A systematic approach to trauma quality improvement.喀麦隆四家医院与损伤相关的发病率和死亡率的可预防性:创伤质量改进的系统方法。
World J Surg. 2024 Nov;48(11):2772-2780. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12303. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
5
Linking Trauma Registry Patients With Insurance Claims: Creating a Longitudinal Patient Record.将创伤登记患者与保险索赔联系起来:创建纵向患者记录。
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:274-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
6
Trauma Quality Improvement Program: A Retrospective Analysis from A Middle Eastern National Trauma Center.创伤质量改进计划:来自中东一家国家创伤中心的回顾性分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;11(21):2865. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212865.
7
Evaluations of statistical methods for outlier detection when benchmarking in clinical registries: a systematic review.临床注册研究中离群值检测的统计方法评估:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e069130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069130.