Suppr超能文献

考察文本风格和认识信念对概念转变的影响。

Examining the impact of text style and epistemic beliefs on conceptual change.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0220766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220766. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Learning can be difficult for students due to incorrect prior knowledge, or misconceptions, interfering with the acquisition of new knowledge. Conceptual change refers to the process of replacing such misconceptions with new and accurate knowledge. The factors associated with conceptual change are currently under debate. The present study attempts to replicate previous investigations of how text style and epistemic beliefs impact conceptual change, and extends this work by investigating how those factors differentially facilitate conceptual change within participants. 157 college students completed a two-part, within participants study in which they completed pretests, read passages addressing a misconception, completed posttests, and were assessed on their epistemic beliefs. Text style (expository vs. refutation) and two dimensions of epistemic beliefs (texture and variability) did not directly impact pre-to-posttest changes in performance. However, interactions between text type, texture, and variability were related to changes in performance.

摘要

学习对于学生来说可能很困难,因为错误的先验知识或误解会干扰新知识的获取。概念转变是指用新的准确知识替代这些误解的过程。与概念转变相关的因素目前仍存在争议。本研究试图复制先前关于文本风格和认识信念如何影响概念转变的研究,并通过研究这些因素如何在参与者中不同程度地促进概念转变来扩展这项工作。157 名大学生完成了一项两部分的参与者内研究,他们在研究中完成了前测、阅读了关于误解的文章、完成了后测,并评估了他们的认识信念。文本风格(说明性与反驳性)和认识信念的两个维度(纹理和可变性)并没有直接影响表现的前测到后测变化。然而,文本类型、纹理和可变性之间的相互作用与表现的变化有关。

相似文献

1
Examining the impact of text style and epistemic beliefs on conceptual change.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 4;14(9):e0220766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220766. eCollection 2019.
2
Refuting misconceptions in medical physiology.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02166-6.
3
Epistemic beliefs as predictors of epistemic emotions: Extending a theoretical model.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2018 Sep;88(3):410-427. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12191. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Using conceptual change theory to help preservice teachers understand dyslexia.
Ann Dyslexia. 2020 Apr;70(1):62-78. doi: 10.1007/s11881-020-00192-z. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
6
When pretesting fails to enhance learning concepts from reading texts.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Sep;24(3):331-346. doi: 10.1037/xap0000160. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
Mechanisms of Epistemic Change-Under Which Circumstances Does Diverging Information Support Epistemic Development?
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 22;9:2278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02278. eCollection 2018.
9
Assessing epistemic sophistication by considering domain-specific absolute and multiplicistic beliefs separately.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Jun;86(2):204-21. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12098. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
10
Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):341-62. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485700. Epub 2010 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Updating during reading comprehension: why causality matters.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):854-65. doi: 10.1037/a0029468. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
2
Accessibility of outdated information.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):979-91. doi: 10.1037/a0019763.
3
A new readability yardstick.
J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):221-33. doi: 10.1037/h0057532.
5
Updating a situation model: a memory-based text processing view.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Sep;24(5):1200-10. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1200.
6
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.
Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):163-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验