O'Brien E J, Rizzella M L, Albrecht J E, Halleran J G
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Sep;24(5):1200-10. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1200.
Previous research (J. E. Albrecht & E. J. O'Brien, 1993) demonstrated that readers were aware of an inconsistency between an earlier described characteristic of a protagonist and a subsequent target action carried out by the protagonist. In a series of 5 experiments, a qualification was added to the described characteristic that restricted the conditions under which the characteristic was operative. According to the here-and-now view of mapping, readers should use this qualification to maintain a fully updated model of the protagonist in active memory and should not experience comprehension difficulty when reading the target action. In contrast, according to the memory-based text processing view, the qualification would not be part of the active discourse model. Instead, it would be reactivated when the target action was read. Thus, readers should still experience comprehension difficulty. Results of all 5 experiments were consistent with the memory-based text processing view.
先前的研究(J. E. 阿尔布雷希特和E. J. 奥布赖恩,1993年)表明,读者能够意识到主人公先前被描述的特征与主人公随后执行的目标动作之间存在不一致。在一系列5个实验中,对所描述的特征添加了一项限定条件,该条件限制了该特征起作用的条件。根据映射的此时此地观点,读者应该利用这一限定条件在工作记忆中维持一个关于主人公的完全更新的模型,并且在阅读目标动作时不应遇到理解困难。相比之下,根据基于记忆的文本处理观点,该限定条件不会成为当前话语模型的一部分。相反,当读到目标动作时它会被重新激活。因此,读者仍然应该会遇到理解困难。所有5个实验的结果都与基于记忆的文本处理观点一致。