• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神科照护中的尤利西斯契约:帮助患者保护自己免受螺旋式下降之害》

Ulysses Contracts in psychiatric care: helping patients to protect themselves from spiralling.

机构信息

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2019 Nov;45(11):693-699. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105511. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2019-105511
PMID:31484783
Abstract

This paper presents four arguments in favour of respecting Ulysses Contracts in the case of individuals who suffer with severe chronic episodic mental illnesses, and who have experienced spiralling and relapse before. First, competence comes in degrees. As such, even if a person meets the usual standard for competence at the point when they wish to refuse treatment (time 2), they may still be competent than they were when they signed the Ulysses Contract (time 1). As such, even if competent at time 1 time 2, there can still be a disparity between the of competence at each time. Second, Ulysses Contracts are important to protect people's concerns. Third, on the approach defended, the restrictions to people's liberty would be temporary, and would be consistent with soft paternalism, rather than hard paternalism: the contracts would be designed in such a way that individuals would be free to change their minds, and to change or cancel their Ulysses Contracts later. Finally, even if one rejects the equivalence thesis (the claim that allowing harm is as bad as doing harm), this is still consistent with the claim that, in , it can be as wrong to a harm as to do a harm. Nevertheless, controversies remain. This paper also highlights several safeguards to minimise risks. Ultimately, we argue that people who are vulnerable to spiralling deserve a way to protect their autonomy as far as possible, using Ulysses Contracts when necessary.

摘要

本文提出了四个论点,支持在患有严重慢性间歇性精神疾病且之前经历过病情恶化和复发的个人的情况下尊重尤利西斯契约。首先,能力是有程度之分的。因此,即使一个人在他们希望拒绝治疗时(时间 2)达到了通常的能力标准,他们在签署尤利西斯契约时(时间 1)可能仍然更有能力。因此,即使在时间 1 时是有能力的,在两个时间点之间,能力的程度仍可能存在差异。其次,尤利西斯契约对于保护人们的关注是很重要的。第三,在辩护的方法中,对人们自由的限制是暂时的,并且与软家长主义一致,而不是硬家长主义:合同将被设计成这样一种方式,即个人可以自由地改变主意,并在以后更改或取消他们的尤利西斯契约。最后,即使人们拒绝等价论点(允许伤害与造成伤害一样糟糕的说法),这仍然与这样的说法一致,即在某些情况下,避免造成伤害与造成伤害一样是错误的。尽管存在争议。本文还强调了一些保障措施,以最大程度地降低风险。最终,我们认为,那些容易病情恶化的人应该有办法尽可能保护他们的自主权,在必要时使用尤利西斯契约。

相似文献

1
Ulysses Contracts in psychiatric care: helping patients to protect themselves from spiralling.《精神科照护中的尤利西斯契约:帮助患者保护自己免受螺旋式下降之害》
J Med Ethics. 2019 Nov;45(11):693-699. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105511. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
Protecting autonomy as authenticity using Ulysses contracts.利用尤利西斯契约将自主性保护为真实性。
J Med Philos. 2005 Aug;30(4):395-409. doi: 10.1080/03605310591008595.
3
Against Ulysses contracts for patients with borderline personality disorder.反对与边缘型人格障碍患者签订契约。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):695-703. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09967-y.
4
How to justify enforcing a Ulysses contract when Ulysses is competent to refuse.当尤利西斯有能力拒绝时,如何为执行尤利西斯契约辩护。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2008 Mar;18(1):87-106. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0001.
5
Ulysses contracts.尤利西斯挛缩。
J Appl Philos. 1986 Mar;3(1):89-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1986.tb00367.x.
6
Reviving Ulysses contracts.复苏尤利西斯合同。 (此翻译可能因缺乏更多背景信息而较难理解其确切含义,“Ulysses”可能是特定的医学或其他领域的术语、项目名、合同名等,需结合更多上下文判断其准确意思 )
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2003 Dec;13(4):373-92. doi: 10.1353/ken.2004.0010.
7
Bound to treatment: the Ulysses contract.受治疗约束:尤利西斯契约。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Jun;14(3):13-6.
8
Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will.受缚于自由:尤利西斯契约与精神科遗嘱
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev. 1987 Spring;45(1):37-68.
9
Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach.精神科护理中的预先指令:一种叙事方法。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27(2):92-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.2.92.
10
Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.尤利西斯与精神科医生:自愿住院合同的法律与政策分析
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 1982 Winter;16(3):777-854.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities and challenges of self-binding directives: A comparison of empirical research with stakeholders in three European countries.自我约束指令的机遇与挑战:对三个欧洲国家利益相关者的实证研究比较。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 9;66(1):e48. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2421.
2
Opportunities and challenges of self-binding directives: an interview study with mental health service users and professionals in the Netherlands.自我约束指令的机遇与挑战:荷兰精神健康服务使用者和专业人士的访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 3;24(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00915-y.
3
Metacognitive deficits are associated with lower sensitivity to preference reversals in nicotine dependence.
认知缺陷与尼古丁依赖者对偏好反转的敏感性降低有关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 17;12(1):19787. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24332-0.
4
Opportunities and risks of self-binding directives: A qualitative study involving stakeholders and researchers in Germany.自我约束指令的机遇与风险:一项涉及德国利益相关者和研究人员的定性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 21;13:974132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974132. eCollection 2022.
5
Reasons for endorsing or rejecting self-binding directives in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study of survey responses from UK service users.支持或反对双相情感障碍患者自我约束指令的原因:来自英国服务使用者调查回应的定性研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):599-609. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00115-2. Epub 2021 May 21.