Ballard Emma, Wang Claire Y T, Hien Tran Tinh, Tong Nguyen Thanh, Marquart Louise, Pava Zuleima, Tarning Joel, O'Rourke Peter, McCarthy James S
1QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Queensland Paediatric Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Centre for Children's Health Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Trop Med Health. 2019 Aug 27;47:49. doi: 10.1186/s41182-019-0176-3. eCollection 2019.
Microscopy and 18S qPCR are the most common and field-friendly methods for quantifying malaria parasite density, and it is important that these methods can be interpreted as giving equivalent results. We compared results of quantitative measurement of parasitemia by microscopy and by 18S qPCR in a phase 2a study. Microscopy positive samples ( = 355; median 810 parasites/μL [IQR 40-10,471]) showed close agreement with 18S qPCR in mean log/mL transformed parasitemia values by paired test (difference 0.04, 95%CI - 0.01-0.10, = 0.088). Excellent intraclass correlation (0.97) and no evidence of systematic or proportional differences by Passing-Bablok regression were observed. 18S qPCR appears to give equivalent parasitemia values to microscopy, which indicates 18S qPCR is an appropriate alternative method to quantify parasitemia in clinical trials.
显微镜检查和18S定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)是最常用且便于现场操作的疟原虫密度定量方法,重要的是这些方法能被解读为给出等效结果。在一项2a期研究中,我们比较了通过显微镜检查和18S qPCR进行疟原虫血症定量测量的结果。显微镜检查呈阳性的样本(n = 355;中位数810个寄生虫/微升[四分位距40 - 10,471]),通过配对检验,在平均对数/毫升转换后的疟原虫血症值方面与18S qPCR显示出密切一致性(差异0.04,95%置信区间 -0.01 - 0.10,P = 0.088)。观察到了出色的组内相关性(0.97),且通过Passing - Bablok回归未发现系统或比例差异的证据。18S qPCR似乎能给出与显微镜检查等效的疟原虫血症值,这表明18S qPCR是在临床试验中定量疟原虫血症的一种合适替代方法。