Suppr超能文献

在埃塞俄比亚西北部消除疟疾背景下,疟原虫组氨酸丰富蛋白2/疟原虫乳酸脱氢酶疟疾快速诊断检测的诊断性能

Diagnostic performance of PfHRP2/pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic tests in elimination setting, northwest Ethiopia.

作者信息

Zeleke Melkamu Tiruneh, Gelaye Kassahun Alemu, Hirpa Adugna Abera, Teshome Mahlet Belachew, Guma Geremew Tasew, Abate Banchamlak Tegegne, Yenesew Muluken Azage

机构信息

School of Public Health, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jul 10;3(7):e0001879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001879. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of malaria is vital for the effectiveness of parasite clearance interventions in elimination settings. Thus, evaluating the diagnostic performance of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in malaria parasite clearance interventions in elimination settings is essential. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of rapid diagnostic tests recently used in detecting malaria parasites in northwest Ethiopia. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2020 to February 2021 comparing PfHRP2/pLDH CareStart malaria RDTs with light microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Blood samples were collected from 310 febrile patients who attended the outpatient department and examined using CareStart RDTs, light microscopy, and PCR. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA/SE version 17.0. The sensitivity of PfHRP2/pLDH CareStart malaria RDTs, regardless of species, was 81.0% [95% CI, 75.3, 86.7] and 75.8% [95% CI, 69.6, 82.0] compared to light microscopy and PCR, while the specificity was 96.8% [95% CI, 93.7, 99.9] and 93.2% [95% CI, 88.6, 97.8], respectively. The false-negative rate of CareStart malaria RDTs in comparison with light microscopy and PCR was 19.0% and 24.2%, respectively. The level of agreement beyond chance between tests was substantial, RDT versus microscopy was 75.0% and RDT versus PCR was 65.1%. The diagnostic performance of PfHRP2/pLDH CareStart RDTs in detecting malaria parasites among febrile patients in the study area was below the recommended WHO standard. The limited diagnostic performance of RDTs in the malaria elimination area undoubtedly affects the impact of malaria parasite clearance interventions. Therefore, parasite clearance intervention like targeted mass drug administration with antimalarial drugs is recommended to back up the limited diagnostic performance of the RDT or replace the existing malaria RDTs with more sensitive, field-deployable, and affordable diagnostic tests.

摘要

在疟疾消除地区,准确诊断疟疾对于寄生虫清除干预措施的有效性至关重要。因此,评估在疟疾消除地区用于疟疾寄生虫清除干预措施的快速诊断检测(RDT)的诊断性能至关重要。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚西北部最近用于检测疟原虫的快速诊断检测的诊断性能。2020年11月至2021年2月进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究,将PfHRP2/pLDH CareStart疟疾RDT与光学显微镜和聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行比较。从310名到门诊部就诊的发热患者中采集血样,并使用CareStart RDT、光学显微镜和PCR进行检测。使用STATA/SE 17.0版进行统计分析。无论疟原虫种类如何,PfHRP2/pLDH CareStart疟疾RDT与光学显微镜和PCR相比,灵敏度分别为81.0% [95%置信区间,75.3, 86.7]和75.8% [95%置信区间,69.6, 82.0],而特异性分别为96.8% [95%置信区间,93.7, 99.9]和93.2% [95%置信区间,88.6, 97.8]。与光学显微镜和PCR相比,CareStart疟疾RDT的假阴性率分别为19.0%和24.2%。检测之间超出偶然的一致性水平较高,RDT与显微镜检查的一致性为75.0%,RDT与PCR的一致性为65.1%。PfHRP2/pLDH CareStart RDT在研究地区发热患者中检测疟原虫的诊断性能低于世界卫生组织推荐标准。疟疾消除地区RDT有限的诊断性能无疑会影响疟疾寄生虫清除干预措施的效果。因此,建议采用如使用抗疟药物进行有针对性的大规模药物给药等寄生虫清除干预措施,以弥补RDT有限的诊断性能,或用更敏感、可在现场部署且价格合理的诊断检测取代现有的疟疾RDT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验