Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychotic Disorders, GGZ Drenthe, Assen, The Netherlands.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020 Apr;51(2):187-199. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00922-4.
The current study examines whether facial emotion identification and family factors at preadolescence (age 11) predict psychotic experiences 5 years later during adolescence (age 16) and whether family factors may mediate the association between facial emotion identification and psychotic experiences. Data was obtained from the epidemiological cohort TRAILS (N = 2059). At preadolescence, a facial emotion identification test and three questionnaires to assess family functioning, perceived parenting styles and parenting stress, were administered. At adolescence, a questionnaire on psychotic experiences was administered. Facial emotion identification at preadolescence was not associated with psychotic experiences at adolescence, and the mediational role of family functioning was not further explored. However, increased overprotective parenting at preadolescence was associated with a higher frequency of psychotic experiences and delusions at adolescence. Future research may examine the mechanism behind the role of overprotective parenting on psychotic experiences during adolescence.
本研究考察了青少年期（16 岁）前青春期（11 岁）的面部情绪识别和家庭因素是否预测 5 年后的精神病体验，以及家庭因素是否可能在面部情绪识别与精神病体验之间的关联中起中介作用。数据来自于 TRAILS（N=2059）的流行病学队列研究。在青少年期前，进行了面部情绪识别测试和三个问卷，以评估家庭功能、感知的父母教养方式和父母压力。在青春期，进行了关于精神病体验的问卷。青少年期前的面部情绪识别与青少年期的精神病体验无关，家庭功能的中介作用也没有进一步探讨。然而，青少年期过度保护的养育方式与更高频率的精神病体验和妄想有关。未来的研究可能会研究过度保护的养育方式对青少年期精神病体验的作用背后的机制。
