Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):76-87. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04366-y. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
This study aimed to identify optimal management decisions for surgeons preforming pancreatic head resection on patients with altered anatomy due to a previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
A multi-national (4), multi-center (28) collaborative of 55 pancreatic surgeons who have performed pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy following RYGB for obesity (2005-2018) was created. Demographics, operative details, and perioperative outcomes from this cohort were analyzed and compared in a propensity-score matched analysis with a multi-center cohort of 5533 pancreatoduodenectomies without prior RYGB.
Ninety-six patients with a previous RYGB undergoing pancreatic head resection were assembled. Pathologic indications between the RYGB and normal anatomy cohorts did not differ. Propensity score matching of RYGB vs. patients with unaltered anatomy demonstrated no differences in major postoperative outcomes. In total 20 distinct reconstructions were employed (of 37 potential options); the three most frequent reconstructions accounted for 52.1%, and none demonstrated superior outcomes. There were no differences in outcomes observed between original biliopancreatic limb use (66.7%) and those where a secondary Roux limb was created for biliopancreatic reconstruction. Remnant stomachs were removed in 54.7% of cases, with no outcome differences between resected and retained stomachs. Venting gastrostomy tubes were used in 36.2% of retained stomachs without obvious outcome benefits. Jejunostomy tubes were used infrequently (11.7%).
Pancreatic head resection after RYGB is an infrequently encountered, unique and challenging scenario for any given surgeon. These patients do not appear to suffer higher morbidity than those with unaltered anatomy. Various technical reconstructive options do not appear to confer distinct benefits.
本研究旨在为因先前 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)而改变解剖结构的患者行胰头切除术的外科医生确定最佳的手术管理决策。
创建了一个由 55 名胰腺外科医生组成的多国家(4 个)、多中心(28 个)合作团队,这些医生在 2005 年至 2018 年间因肥胖而行 RYGB 后进行了胰十二指肠切除术或全胰切除术。对该队列的人口统计学、手术细节和围手术期结果进行了分析,并与 5533 例无先前 RYGB 的胰十二指肠切除术多中心队列进行了倾向评分匹配分析。
共收集了 96 例因先前 RYGB 而行胰头切除术的患者。RYGB 和正常解剖队列之间的病理指征没有差异。RYGB 与未改变解剖结构的患者进行倾向评分匹配后,主要术后结果没有差异。总共使用了 20 种不同的重建方法(37 种潜在方法中的 3 种);前三种最常见的重建方法占 52.1%,没有一种方法表现出更好的结果。在原始胆胰肠吻合支的使用(66.7%)和为胆胰重建创建二次 Roux 肠吻合支的情况下,观察到的结果没有差异。在 54.7%的病例中切除了残胃,切除和保留胃之间的结果没有差异。在保留胃中使用了通气胃造口管,在没有明显获益的情况下使用了 36.2%。空肠造口管使用频率较低(11.7%)。
RYGB 后的胰头切除术对任何外科医生来说都是一种罕见的、独特的和具有挑战性的情况。这些患者的发病率似乎并不高于未改变解剖结构的患者。各种技术重建选择似乎没有明显的获益。