Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Lymphat Res Biol. 2020 Apr;18(2):101-109. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0078. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
This study aimed at testing whether arm-to-leg ratios of extracellular water (ECW) and ECW normalized to intracellular water (ICW), measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), can accurately detect bilateral, lower-limb lymphedema, and whether accounting for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) improves the diagnostic performance of cut-offs. We conducted a dual-approach, case-control study consisting of cases of bilateral, lower-limb lymphedema and healthy controls who self-reported absence of lymphedema. The diagnostic performance using normative data-derived cut-offs (i.e., mean + 0.5 standard deviation [SD] to mean + 3 SD; = 136, 66% controls) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-derived cut-offs ( = 746, 94% controls) was assessed. The impact of sex, age, and BMI was investigated by comparing stratified and nonstratified normative data-derived cut-offs, and ROC curves generated from adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression models. Arm-to-leg ratios of ECW between mean + 0.5 SD and mean + 1 SD showed fair to good sensitivity (0.73-0.84) and poor to good specificity (0.64 to 0.84). Arm-to-leg ratios of ECW/ICW failed to detect lymphedema (sensitivity <0.5). Stratification by sex, or by sex and age, yielded similar results to nonstratified cut-offs. Cut-offs derived from adjusted ROC curves showed both good sensitivity (0.83-0.89) and specificity (0.8-0.84). These findings represent new BIS criteria for diagnosing lower-limb lymphedema that do not rely on comparison to baseline measures or the presence of a nonaffected, contralateral limb.
本研究旨在测试通过生物阻抗谱(BIS)测量的细胞外水(ECW)和 ECW 与细胞内水(ICW)的比值是否可以准确检测双侧下肢淋巴水肿,以及是否考虑性别、年龄和体重指数(BMI)可以提高截断值的诊断性能。我们进行了一项双方法病例对照研究,包括双侧下肢淋巴水肿病例和自我报告无淋巴水肿的健康对照。使用基于参考值的截断值(即,均值+0.5 标准差[SD]至均值+3 SD;n=136,66%的对照者)和接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线衍生的截断值(n=746,94%的对照者)评估诊断性能。通过比较分层和非分层基于参考值的截断值,以及从调整和未调整的逻辑回归模型生成的 ROC 曲线,研究了性别、年龄和 BMI 的影响。ECW 臂-腿比值在均值+0.5 SD 和均值+1 SD 之间显示出良好到中等的敏感性(0.73-0.84)和较差到良好的特异性(0.64 至 0.84)。ECW/ICW 臂-腿比值未能检测到淋巴水肿(敏感性<0.5)。按性别或性别和年龄分层与非分层截断值的结果相似。从调整后的 ROC 曲线得出的截断值显示出良好的敏感性(0.83-0.89)和特异性(0.8-0.84)。这些发现代表了用于诊断下肢淋巴水肿的新的 BIS 标准,这些标准不依赖于与基线测量值或无病变对侧肢体的比较。