Suppr超能文献

基于生物阻抗谱的下肢淋巴水肿诊断方法。

A Bioimpedance Spectroscopy-Based Method for Diagnosis of Lower-Limb Lymphedema.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Lymphat Res Biol. 2020 Apr;18(2):101-109. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0078. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

Abstract

This study aimed at testing whether arm-to-leg ratios of extracellular water (ECW) and ECW normalized to intracellular water (ICW), measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), can accurately detect bilateral, lower-limb lymphedema, and whether accounting for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) improves the diagnostic performance of cut-offs. We conducted a dual-approach, case-control study consisting of cases of bilateral, lower-limb lymphedema and healthy controls who self-reported absence of lymphedema. The diagnostic performance using normative data-derived cut-offs (i.e., mean + 0.5 standard deviation [SD] to mean + 3 SD;  = 136, 66% controls) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-derived cut-offs ( = 746, 94% controls) was assessed. The impact of sex, age, and BMI was investigated by comparing stratified and nonstratified normative data-derived cut-offs, and ROC curves generated from adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression models. Arm-to-leg ratios of ECW between mean + 0.5 SD and mean + 1 SD showed fair to good sensitivity (0.73-0.84) and poor to good specificity (0.64 to 0.84). Arm-to-leg ratios of ECW/ICW failed to detect lymphedema (sensitivity <0.5). Stratification by sex, or by sex and age, yielded similar results to nonstratified cut-offs. Cut-offs derived from adjusted ROC curves showed both good sensitivity (0.83-0.89) and specificity (0.8-0.84). These findings represent new BIS criteria for diagnosing lower-limb lymphedema that do not rely on comparison to baseline measures or the presence of a nonaffected, contralateral limb.

摘要

本研究旨在测试通过生物阻抗谱(BIS)测量的细胞外水(ECW)和 ECW 与细胞内水(ICW)的比值是否可以准确检测双侧下肢淋巴水肿,以及是否考虑性别、年龄和体重指数(BMI)可以提高截断值的诊断性能。我们进行了一项双方法病例对照研究,包括双侧下肢淋巴水肿病例和自我报告无淋巴水肿的健康对照。使用基于参考值的截断值(即,均值+0.5 标准差[SD]至均值+3 SD;n=136,66%的对照者)和接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线衍生的截断值(n=746,94%的对照者)评估诊断性能。通过比较分层和非分层基于参考值的截断值,以及从调整和未调整的逻辑回归模型生成的 ROC 曲线,研究了性别、年龄和 BMI 的影响。ECW 臂-腿比值在均值+0.5 SD 和均值+1 SD 之间显示出良好到中等的敏感性(0.73-0.84)和较差到良好的特异性(0.64 至 0.84)。ECW/ICW 臂-腿比值未能检测到淋巴水肿(敏感性<0.5)。按性别或性别和年龄分层与非分层截断值的结果相似。从调整后的 ROC 曲线得出的截断值显示出良好的敏感性(0.83-0.89)和特异性(0.8-0.84)。这些发现代表了用于诊断下肢淋巴水肿的新的 BIS 标准,这些标准不依赖于与基线测量值或无病变对侧肢体的比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验