Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
City of Hope, Duarte, California.
J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):7-19. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0210.
Early palliative care (PC) integrated with oncology care improves quality of life (QOL), depression symptoms, illness understanding, and end-of-life (EOL) care for patients with advanced lung cancer. The aims of this trial are to compare the effect of delivering early integrated PC through telehealth versus in-person on patient and caregiver outcomes. We hypothesize that both modalities for delivering early PC would be equivalent for improving patient QOL, communication about EOL care preferences with their oncologist, and length of stay in hospice. For this comparative effectiveness trial, we will enroll and randomize 1250 adult patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who are not being treated with curative intent, to receive either early integrated telehealth or in-person PC at 20 cancer centers throughout the United States. Patients may also invite a family caregiver to participate in the study. Patients and their caregivers in both study groups meet at least every four weeks with a PC clinician from within 12 weeks of patient diagnosis of advanced NSCLC until death. Participants complete measures of QOL, mood, and quality of communication with oncologists at baseline before randomization and at 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Information on health care utilization, including length of stay in hospice, will be collected from patients' health records. To test equivalence in outcomes between study groups, we will compute analysis of covariance and mixed linear models, controlling for baseline scores and study site. To ensure that this comparative effectiveness trial and findings are as patient centered and meaningful as possible, we have incorporated a robust patient and stakeholder engagement plan. Our stakeholder partners include (1) patients/families, (2) PC clinicians, (3) telehealth experts and clinician users, (4) representatives from health care systems and medical insurance providers, and (5) health care policy makers and advocates. These stakeholders will inform and provide feedback about every phase of study implementation.
早期姑息治疗(PC)与肿瘤学治疗相结合可改善生活质量(QOL)、抑郁症状、疾病认知以及晚期肺癌患者的临终关怀。本试验旨在比较通过远程医疗和面对面两种方式提供早期综合 PC 对患者和护理人员结局的影响。我们假设这两种早期 PC 治疗方式在改善患者 QOL、与肿瘤医生沟通临终关怀偏好以及临终关怀住院时间方面的效果是等效的。
在这项比较有效性试验中,我们将在美国 20 家癌症中心招募并随机分配 1250 名患有晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)且不接受根治性治疗的成年患者,以接受早期综合远程医疗或面对面 PC 治疗。患者也可以邀请一名家庭护理人员参加研究。在患者被诊断为晚期 NSCLC 后 12 周内,两组患者及其护理人员至少每四周与一名姑息治疗临床医生会面,直至患者死亡。参与者在随机分组前和 12、24、36 和 48 周时完成生活质量、情绪和与肿瘤医生沟通质量的测量。将从患者的健康记录中收集医疗保健利用信息,包括临终关怀住院时间。为了在两组之间测试结局的等效性,我们将进行协方差分析和混合线性模型分析,控制基线评分和研究地点。
为了确保这项比较有效性试验和研究结果尽可能地以患者为中心并具有实际意义,我们纳入了一项强大的患者和利益相关者参与计划。我们的利益相关者合作伙伴包括(1)患者/家属,(2)姑息治疗临床医生,(3)远程医疗专家和临床医生使用者,(4)医疗保健系统和医疗保险提供商代表,以及(5)医疗保健政策制定者和倡导者。这些利益相关者将在研究实施的每个阶段提供信息并提供反馈。