Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
ACHIEVE Centre for Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 5;14(9):e0222157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222157. eCollection 2019.
In light of increasing calls for transparent reporting of research and prevention of detrimental research practices, we conducted a cross-sectional machine-assisted analysis of a representative sample of scientific journals' instructions to authors (ItAs) across all disciplines. We investigated addressing of 19 topics related to transparency in reporting and research integrity. Only three topics were addressed in more than one third of ItAs: conflicts of interest, plagiarism, and the type of peer review the journal employs. Health and Life Sciences journals, journals published by medium or large publishers, and journals registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) were more likely to address many of the analysed topics, while Arts & Humanities journals were least likely to do so. Despite the recent calls for transparency and integrity in research, our analysis shows that most scientific journals need to update their ItAs to align them with practices which prevent detrimental research practices and ensure transparent reporting of research.
鉴于越来越多的人呼吁透明报告研究成果并防止有害的研究行为,我们对各学科具有代表性的科学期刊作者指南(ItAs)进行了横断面机器辅助分析。我们调查了与报告透明度和研究诚信相关的 19 个主题的处理情况。只有三个主题在超过三分之一的 ItAs 中得到了处理:利益冲突、剽窃和期刊采用的同行评审类型。健康和生命科学期刊、由中大型出版商出版的期刊以及在开放获取期刊目录(DOAJ)中注册的期刊更有可能涉及到许多分析的主题,而艺术与人文期刊则最不可能这样做。尽管最近呼吁研究的透明度和诚信,但我们的分析表明,大多数科学期刊需要更新其 ItAs,以使其与防止有害研究行为和确保研究报告透明性的实践保持一致。