Smyth Elizabeth C, Moehler Markus
Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 QQ0, UK.
Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Aug 28;11:1758835919867522. doi: 10.1177/1758835919867522. eCollection 2019.
Survival for patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC) remains poor and the historical lack of evidence-based therapeutic options after second-line therapy is reflected in current clinical guidelines for this condition. Despite uncertainty about optimal therapeutic strategies, further treatment is appropriate for some patients after failure of second line and may prolong survival. This approach has been reported in clinical trials and is becoming more common in real-world clinical settings. Several prognostic factors may increase the likelihood that a patient will be eligible for treatment in the third-line setting, including geographic location, status at diagnosis and response to treatment. There has been little progress over the last decade until the results from two large phase III randomized controlled trials completed in the last year: the ATTRACTION-2 trial with the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, nivolumab, in an Asian population; and the TAGS trial with the oral chemotherapy trifluridine/tipiracil in a global population. Both ATTRACTION-2 and TAGS reported positive results in third-line treatment in advanced GC in specific patient groups. A further recently reported study, KEYNOTE-059, which was a single-arm phase II trial of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in a mainly non-Asian population, has provided evidence supporting the use of this immunotherapy in patients with advanced GC. As further third-line options become available, more GC patients are expected to benefit from an individualized evidence-based approach to later-line therapy, with a common goal of extending survival and improving outcomes for their refractory disease.
不可切除的晚期或复发性胃癌(GC)患者的生存率仍然很低,二线治疗后缺乏循证治疗方案这一历史情况在当前针对该疾病的临床指南中有所体现。尽管最佳治疗策略尚不确定,但对一些患者而言,二线治疗失败后进行进一步治疗是合适的,且可能延长生存期。这种方法已在临床试验中报道,并且在现实世界的临床环境中越来越普遍。几个预后因素可能会增加患者符合三线治疗条件的可能性,包括地理位置、诊断时的状态以及对治疗的反应。在过去十年中进展甚微,直到去年完成的两项大型III期随机对照试验取得结果:一项是在亚洲人群中进行的ATTRACTION-2试验,使用程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)抑制剂纳武单抗;另一项是在全球人群中进行的TAGS试验,使用口服化疗药物曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶。ATTRACTION-2和TAGS在晚期GC特定患者群体的三线治疗中均报告了阳性结果。最近报道的另一项研究KEYNOTE-059,这是一项在主要非亚洲人群中进行的PD-1抑制剂帕博利珠单抗的单臂II期试验,为该免疫疗法在晚期GC患者中的应用提供了证据支持。随着更多三线治疗方案的出现,预计更多GC患者将从针对后线治疗的个体化循证方法中受益,共同目标是延长生存期并改善其难治性疾病的治疗结果。