Suppr超能文献

机器人胰腺手术国际共识声明

International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

作者信息

Liu Rong, Wakabayashi Go, Palanivelu Chinnusamy, Tsung Allan, Yang Kehu, Goh Brian K P, Chong Charing Ching-Ning, Kang Chang Moo, Peng Chenghong, Kakiashvili Eli, Han Ho-Seong, Kim Hong-Jin, He Jin, Lee Jae Hoon, Takaori Kyoichi, Marino Marco Vito, Wang Shen-Nien, Guo Tiankang, Hackert Thilo, Huang Ting-Shuo, Anusak Yiengpruksawan, Fong Yuman, Nagakawa Yuichi, Shyr Yi-Ming, Wu Yao-Ming, Zhao Yupei

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan.

出版信息

Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Aug;8(4):345-360. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.08.

Abstract

The robotic surgical system has been applied to various types of pancreatic surgery. However, controversies exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic pancreatic surgery and put forth experts' consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group* and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 19 topics were analyzed. The first 16 recommendations were generated by GRADE using an evidence-based method (EBM) and focused on the safety, feasibility, indication, techniques, certification of the robotic surgeon, and cost-effectiveness of robotic pancreatic surgery. The remaining three recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion due to insufficient EBM results. Since the current amount of evidence was low/meager as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed in the future to validate these recommendations.

摘要

机器人手术系统已应用于各种类型的胰腺手术。然而,关于机器人手术的安全性、可行性、有效性和成本效益等多种因素仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估机器人胰腺手术的现状,并提出专家共识和建议以促进其发展。基于世界卫生组织《指南制定手册》,成立了共识指导小组*和共识发展小组,以确定主题、编写循证文件并提出建议。采用GRADE Grid方法和德尔菲投票来制定建议。共分析了19个主题。前16条建议由GRADE使用循证方法(EBM)生成,重点关注机器人胰腺手术的安全性、可行性、适应症、技术、机器人外科医生认证和成本效益。由于EBM结果不足,其余三条建议基于文献综述和专家小组意见。由于通过GRADE方法评估的当前证据量较少/不足,未来需要进一步进行随机对照试验(RCT)来验证这些建议。

相似文献

1
International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.机器人胰腺手术国际共识声明
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Aug;8(4):345-360. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.08.
2
International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018.2018 年机器人肝切除术国际共识声明。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 28;25(12):1432-1444. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1432.
4
International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.《2023年机器人胰腺手术国际共识指南》
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):89-104. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-132. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
8
[A single-team experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in 1010 cases].[单团队1010例机器人胰腺手术经验]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Feb 20;38(2):130-134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.02.02.
9

引用本文的文献

10
International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.《2023年机器人胰腺手术国际共识指南》
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):89-104. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-132. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验