• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进微创肝胆胰手术:采用障碍和公平获取。

Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5643-5650. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11078-1. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11078-1
PMID:39117957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11980437/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a growing body of literature supporting the safety of robotic hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) procedures, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques in HPB surgery has been slow compared to other specialties. We aimed to identify barriers to implementing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in HPB and present a framework that highlights opportunities to improve adoption.

METHODS

A modified nominal group technique guided by a 13-question framework was utilized. The meeting session was guided by senior authors, and field notes were also collected. Results were reviewed and free text responses were analyzed for major themes. A follow-up priority setting survey was distributed to all participants based on meeting results.

RESULTS

Twenty three surgeons with varying robotic HPB experience from different practice settings participated in the discussion. The majority of surgeons identified operating room efficiency, having a dedicated operating room team, and the overall hospital culture and openness to innovation as important facilitators of implementing a RAS program. In contrast, cost, capacity building, disparities/risk of regionalization, lack of evidence, and time/effort were identified as the most significant barriers. When asked to prioritize the most important issues to be addressed, participants noted access and availability of the robot as the most important issue, followed by institutional support, cost, quality of supporting evidence, and need for robotic training.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports surgeons' perceptions of major barriers to equitable access and increased implementation of robotic HPB surgery. To overcome such barriers, defining key resources, adopting innovative solutions, and developing better methods of collecting long term data should be the top priorities.

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多的文献支持机器人肝胆胰(HPB)手术的安全性,但与其他专业相比,微创技术在 HPB 手术中的应用进展缓慢。我们旨在确定在 HPB 中实施机器人辅助手术(RAS)的障碍,并提出一个突出改善采用机会的框架。

方法

采用由 13 个问题框架指导的改良名义小组技术。会议由资深作者指导,并收集现场记录。审查结果并分析主要主题的自由文本回复。根据会议结果向所有参与者分发了后续的优先事项设定调查。

结果

来自不同实践环境的 23 名具有不同机器人 HPB 经验的外科医生参加了讨论。大多数外科医生认为手术室效率、有专门的手术室团队以及整体医院文化和对创新的开放性是实施 RAS 计划的重要促进因素。相比之下,成本、能力建设、差异/区域化风险、缺乏证据以及时间/精力被认为是最大的障碍。当被要求优先考虑需要解决的最重要问题时,参与者指出机器人的可及性和可用性是最重要的问题,其次是机构支持、成本、支持证据的质量以及对机器人培训的需求。

结论

本研究报告了外科医生对公平获得和增加机器人 HPB 手术实施的主要障碍的看法。为了克服这些障碍,确定关键资源、采用创新解决方案以及开发更好的长期数据收集方法应是重中之重。

相似文献

1
Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access.推进微创肝胆胰手术:采用障碍和公平获取。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5643-5650. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11078-1. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: ensuring safety with implementation.推进微创肝胰胆手术:实施中的安全保障。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4365-4373. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10957-x. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
Implementation of a robotic hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery program: a swedish referral center's experience.机器人肝胆胰手术项目的实施:瑞典一家转诊中心的经验
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02241-4.
4
The Role of Simulation in Attaining Proficiency in Minimally Invasive Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery.模拟在微创肝胆胰外科手术熟练程度中的作用。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 May;31(5):561-564. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0083.
5
Curriculum matrix development for a hepato-pancreato-biliary robotic surgery fellowship.肝胆胰机器人手术专科培训课程设置。
Can J Surg. 2021 Dec 8;64(6):E657-E662. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002620. Print 2021 Nov-Dec.
6
Recommendations on Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery. The Paris Jury-Based Consensus Conference.机器人肝胆胰外科手术推荐意见。基于巴黎评审团的共识会议
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 1;281(1):136-153. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006365. Epub 2024 May 24.
7
Safe implementation of a minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary program, a narrative review and institutional experience.安全实施微创肝胆胰计划:叙述性综述及机构经验
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;128(8):1347-1352. doi: 10.1002/jso.27455. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
8
Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.600 例微创胰腺和肝脏切除术中从腹腔镜手术转为机器人手术的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2659-2672. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09735-4. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
9
Perspectives on robotic HPB training in the UK: a survey analysis.英国对机器人 HPB 培训的看法:调查分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Jun;26(6):833-839. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
10
Training and practice of the next generation HPB surgeon: analysis of the 2014 AHPBA residents' and fellows' symposium survey.下一代肝胰胆外科医生的培训与实践:2014年美国肝胰胆协会住院医师及研究员研讨会调查分析
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Dec;17(12):1096-104. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12498. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Surgical Management of Complicated Diverticulitis.复杂憩室炎的机器人手术治疗
Curr Trauma Rep. 2025;11(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s40719-025-00289-z. Epub 2025 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative multimodal prehabilitation before elective colorectal cancer surgery in patients with WHO performance status I or II: randomized clinical trial.择期结直肠癌手术患者的 WHO 体力状态 I 或 II 术前多模态预康复:随机临床试验。
BJS Open. 2023 Nov 1;7(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad134.
2
Ranking Decision-Making Criteria for Early Adoption of Innovative Surgical Technologies.创新手术技术早期采用的决策制定标准排名。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2343703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43703.
3
Disparities in access to robotic technology and perioperative outcomes among patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者在获得机器人技术和围手术期结局方面的差异。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;128(2):375-384. doi: 10.1002/jso.27274. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
4
Quality of life after open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: long-term results from a randomized clinical trial.开腹与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的生活质量比较:一项随机临床试验的长期结果。
BJS Open. 2023 Mar 7;7(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad002.
5
Barriers and enablers to the effective implementation of robotic assisted surgery.机器人辅助手术有效实施的障碍和促进因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273696. eCollection 2022.
6
The Atlantic divide: contrasting surgical robotics training in the USA, UK and Ireland.大西洋鸿沟:美国、英国和爱尔兰对比鲜明的外科机器人培训。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01399-5. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
7
Disparities in utilization of robotic surgery for colon cancer: an evaluation of the U.S. National Cancer Database.结直肠癌机器人手术应用的差异:美国国家癌症数据库的评估。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1299-1306. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01371-3. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
8
Curriculum matrix development for a hepato-pancreato-biliary robotic surgery fellowship.肝胆胰机器人手术专科培训课程设置。
Can J Surg. 2021 Dec 8;64(6):E657-E662. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002620. Print 2021 Nov-Dec.
9
Expert Consensus Guidelines: How to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection.专家共识指南:如何安全地进行微创解剖性肝切除术。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Jan;29(1):16-32. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1079. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
10
Expert Consensus Recommendations for Robotic Surgery Credentialing.机器人手术认证的专家共识建议。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):88-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004531. Epub 2020 Nov 17.