Suppr超能文献

有颈痛和已知脊柱退化的人群对枕头的偏好:一项初步随机对照试验。

Pillow preferences of people with neck pain and known spinal degeneration: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia -

James Cook University, Douglas, Australia -

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Dec;55(6):783-791. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05263-8. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In people without cervical pathologies, changing to a latex or polyester pillow is reported to decrease waking cervical symptoms. Whether this also occurs for people with spinal degeneration in the neck is unknown.

AIM

This pilot study tested recruitment strategies for people with cervical spine degeneration, and the effect of different pillows on cervical waking symptoms, sleep quality, cervical range of motion, neck disability index and quality of life.

DESIGN

A randomized sequential-block double-blind controlled trial.

SETTING

A community-based study.

POPULATION

Adult volunteers (18+ years) with regular waking cervical symptoms (headache, cervical pain and/or stiffness, scapular pain), confirmed radiologic evidence of cervical spine degeneration, side sleeper and "usual" use of one pillow.

METHODS

Participants were recruited, through community advertising at medical and physiotherapy practices, local community groups, and via newspaper, radio and websites. After screening for eligibility, they tested latex and polyester pillows for 28 days each, interspersed with 28 days on "usual" pillow for washout, and comparison. Subjects ceased using a trial pillow if it affected sleep quality or waking symptoms. Cervical range of motion, neck disability index and quality of life were measured pre-post each pillow trial, whilst waking symptoms and sleep quality were assessed daily.

RESULTS

Of 117 local volunteers, 92 had radiologically-confirmed cervical spondylosis, and a further 45 (48.9%) were excluded for medical conditions, sleep position and/or pillow use. Approximately 70% "usual" pillows were polyester. Overall no pillow significantly altered any outcome measure. Considering trends however, the polyester pillow significantly increased side flexion range of movement on waking and showed some effect on nocturnal-waking cervical pain. The latex pillow did not perform well on any outcome measure. Significantly more subjects completed the polyester pillow trial than the latex pillow trial (post-hoc power 80% vs. 55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Well-powered studies to truly detect pillow impact on waking symptoms and sleep quality require 400+ symptomatic subjects.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

It has previously been reported that using a latex or polyester pillow significantly improves waking cervical symptoms in the general population. This pilot study did not replicate these results in people with known cervical spine degeneration.

摘要

背景

在没有颈椎疾病的人群中,改用乳胶或聚酯枕头据称可减少醒来时的颈椎症状。对于患有颈椎退行性病变的人群,这种情况是否会发生尚不清楚。

目的

本初步研究旨在测试招募患有颈椎退行性病变的人群的策略,以及不同枕头对颈椎醒来症状、睡眠质量、颈椎活动度、颈部残疾指数和生活质量的影响。

设计

随机序贯块双盲对照试验。

设置

社区为基础的研究。

人群

成年志愿者(18 岁以上),有规律的醒来时的颈椎症状(头痛、颈痛和/或僵硬、肩胛痛),经影像学证实有颈椎退行性病变,侧睡,“常规”使用一种枕头。

方法

通过医疗和物理治疗诊所、当地社区团体以及报纸、广播和网站进行社区广告宣传招募参与者。经过资格筛选后,他们分别试用乳胶和聚酯枕头 28 天,中间穿插 28 天“常规”枕头的洗脱期和对照期。如果试验枕头影响睡眠质量或醒来症状,参与者应停止使用。在每次枕头试验前后测量颈椎活动度、颈部残疾指数和生活质量,同时每天评估醒来症状和睡眠质量。

结果

在当地的 117 名志愿者中,有 92 名经影像学证实患有颈椎病,另有 45 名(48.9%)因医学状况、睡眠姿势和/或枕头使用情况被排除在外。“常规”枕头中约有 70%为聚酯材质。总的来说,没有一种枕头明显改变任何结果测量指标。然而,考虑到趋势,聚酯枕头在醒来时显著增加了侧屈活动度,并对夜间醒来时的颈椎疼痛有一定影响。乳胶枕头在任何结果测量指标上表现都不佳。完成聚酯枕头试验的受试者明显多于完成乳胶枕头试验的受试者(事后检验功率 80%对 55%)。

结论

真正检测枕头对醒来症状和睡眠质量影响的有力研究需要 400 多名有症状的受试者。

临床康复影响

先前有研究报道,在普通人群中,使用乳胶或聚酯枕头可显著改善醒来时的颈椎症状。本初步研究在已知患有颈椎退行性病变的人群中并未复制这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验