Headache and Orofacial Pain Effort (H.O.P.E.), Biologic and Materials Sciences Department, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Dent Res. 2019 Nov;98(12):1324-1331. doi: 10.1177/0022034519871938. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
Clinicians have the dilemma of prescribing opioid or nonopioid analgesics to chronic pain patients; however, the impact of pain on our endogenous µ-opioid system and how our genetic profile (specifically catechol-O-methyltransferase [] polymorphisms) impacts its activation are currently unknown. Twelve chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients and 12 healthy controls (HCs) were scanned using positron emission tomography (PET) with [C]carfentanil, a selective radioligand for µ-opioid receptors (µORs). The first 45 min of each PET measured the µOR nondisplaceable binding potential (BP) at resting state, and the last 45 min consisted of a 20-min masseteric pain challenge with an injection of 5% hypertonic saline. Participants were also genotyped for different COMT alleles. There were no group differences in µOR BP at resting state (early phase). However, during the masseteric pain challenge (late phase), TMD patients exhibited significant reductions in µOR BP (decreased [C]carfentanil binding) in the contralateral parahippocampus ( = 0.002) compared to HCs. The µOR BP was also significantly lower in TMD patients with longer pain chronicity ( < 0.001). When considering genotype and chronic pain suffering, TMD patients with the Met substitution had higher pain sensitivity and longer pain chronicity with a 5-y threshold for µOR BP changes to occur in the parahippocampus. Together, the TMD diagnosis, Met substitution, and pain chronicity explained 52% of µOR BP variance in the parahippocampus (cumulative = 52%, < 0.003, and HC vs. TMD Cohen's effect size = 1.33 SD). There is strong evidence of dysregulation of our main analgesic and limbic systems in chronic TMD pain. The data also support precision medicine by helping identify TMD patients who may be more susceptible to chronic pain sensitivity and opioid dysfunction based on their genetic profile.
临床医生在为慢性疼痛患者开处方阿片类或非阿片类镇痛药时面临两难境地;然而,疼痛对我们内源性μ-阿片系统的影响以及我们的遗传特征(特别是儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶 [] 多态性)如何影响其激活目前尚不清楚。12 名慢性颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者和 12 名健康对照者(HCs)接受正电子发射断层扫描(PET)检查,使用 [C] 卡芬太尼作为μ-阿片受体(μORs)的选择性放射性配体。每个 PET 的前 45 分钟测量静息状态下μOR 不可置换结合潜力(BP),最后 45 分钟包括 20 分钟的咀嚼肌疼痛挑战,注射 5%高渗盐水。参与者还接受了不同 COMT 等位基因的基因分型。在静息状态(早期)时,两组之间的μOR BP 没有差异。然而,在咀嚼肌疼痛挑战(晚期)期间,TMD 患者与 HCs 相比,对侧海马旁回的μOR BP([C] 卡芬太尼结合减少)显著降低( = 0.002)。μOR BP 在疼痛持续时间较长的 TMD 患者中也显著降低( < 0.001)。当考虑到基因型和慢性疼痛时,具有 Met 取代的 TMD 患者具有更高的疼痛敏感性和更长的疼痛持续性,μOR BP 在海马旁回发生变化的 5 年阈值。总的来说,TMD 诊断、Met 取代和疼痛持续性解释了海马旁回 μOR BP 变异的 52%(累积 = 52%, < 0.003,HC 与 TMD 的 Cohen 效应大小 = 1.33 SD)。有强有力的证据表明,慢性 TMD 疼痛会导致我们的主要镇痛和边缘系统失调。该数据还支持精准医学,有助于根据遗传特征确定可能更容易发生慢性疼痛敏感性和阿片功能障碍的 TMD 患者。