Key Laboratory of Biomedical Functional Materials, School of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Perception and Systems for High-Dimensional Information of Ministry of Education, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;96:109758. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109758. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Two popular debilitating illness, unipolar depression (UD) and bipolar disorder (BD), have the similar symptoms and tight association on the psychopathological level, leading to a clinical challenge to distinguish them. In order to figure out the underlying common and different mechanism of both mood disorders, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data derived from 36 UD patients, 42 BD patients (specially type I, BD-I) and 45 healthy controls (HC) were analyzed retrospectively in this study. Functional brain networks were firstly constructed on both group and individual levels with a density 0.2, which was determined by a network thresholding approach based on modular similarity. Then we investigated the alterations of modular structure and other topological properties of the functional brain network, including global network characteristics and nodal network measures. The results demonstrated that the functional brain networks of UD and BD-I groups preserved the modularity and small-worldness property. However, compared with HC, reduced number of modules was observed in both patients' groups with shared alterations occurring in hippocampus, para hippocampal gyrus, amygdala and superior parietal gyrus and distinct changes of modular composition mainly in the caudate regions of basal ganglia. Additionally, for the network characteristics, compared to HC, significantly decreased global efficiency and small-worldness were observed in BD-I. For the nodal metrics, significant decrease of local efficiency was found in several regions in both UD and BD-I, while a UD-specified increase of participant coefficient was found in the right paracentral lobule and the right thalamus. These findings may contribute to throw light on the neuropathological mechanisms underlying the two disorders and further help to explore objective biomarkers for the correct diagnosis of UD and BD.
两种常见的使人衰弱的疾病,单相抑郁(UD)和双相障碍(BD),在精神病理学水平上具有相似的症状和紧密的关联,导致临床难以区分它们。为了找出这两种情绪障碍的潜在共同和不同的机制,本研究回顾性地分析了 36 名 UD 患者、42 名 BD 患者(特别是 I 型,BD-I)和 45 名健康对照者(HC)的静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)数据。首先在组和个体水平上构建功能脑网络,网络阈值采用基于模块相似性的方法确定,阈值为 0.2。然后我们研究了功能脑网络的模块结构和其他拓扑性质的变化,包括全局网络特征和节点网络测量。结果表明,UD 和 BD-I 组的功能脑网络保持了模块性和小世界性质。然而,与 HC 相比,两个患者组的模块数量减少,共享改变发生在海马体、海马旁回、杏仁核和顶叶上回,而基底神经节的尾状核区域存在明显的模块组成变化。此外,对于网络特征,与 HC 相比,BD-I 的全局效率和小世界性显著降低。对于节点指标,在 UD 和 BD-I 中,几个区域的局部效率显著降低,而右中央小叶和右丘脑的参与者系数显著增加。这些发现可能有助于阐明这两种疾病的神经病理学机制,并进一步有助于探索 UD 和 BD 正确诊断的客观生物标志物。