Suppr超能文献

评估纸片扩散试验和琼脂筛选对预测金黄色葡萄球菌中介导耐甲氧西林的 oxacillin 耐药性的效果,发现了一株头孢西丁敏感、mecA 阳性的金黄色葡萄球菌 27 克隆复合体。

Evaluation of disc diffusion tests and agar screening for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus lugdunensis revealed a cefoxitin-susceptible, mecA-positive S. lugdunensis clonal complex 27 clone.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China; Carol Yu Center for Infection, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China; Carol Yu Center for Infection, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Mar;20:260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.08.021. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated disc diffusion tests and agar screening for detecting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus lugdunensis (S. lugdunensis).

METHODS

Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates (n = 179) from diverse sources in Hong Kong during 1998-2018 were investigated by disc diffusion tests (cefoxitin and oxacillin) and inoculation onto oxacillin (1 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL) and chromID methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) agars. The results were compared with mecA PCR as the reference. Isolates with discordant results were further tested by MIC and penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) assays.

RESULTS

Cefoxitin and oxacillin zone diameters were not distributed in ways that allowed reliable division of the mecA-positive (n = 52) and mecA-negative (n = 127) isolates. On applying the 2019 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 breakpoints for cefoxitin disc results, there was 88% categorical agreement (CA) and 40% very major error (VME). Screening using 2 μg/mL oxacillin agar reliably differentiated mecA-positive and mecA-negative isolates (100% CA) without any major error (ME) or VME results. The performance of screening using 1 μg/mL oxacillin agar or ChromID MRSA agar was variable (74-89% CA, 0-38% ME and 0-37% VME). The mecA-positive isolates (n = 21) that could not be detected by the cefoxitin disc test were further characterised. The cefoxitin MIC for all 21 isolates was ≤4 μg/mL. Twenty isolates had an oxacillin MIC of 1-2 μg/mL and one had an oxacillin MIC of 4 μg/mL. All had positive PBP2a results and were typed as clonal cluster 27/SCCmec V.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the need to evaluate phenotypic methods using mecA-positive S. lugdunensis with different oxacillin resistance phenotypes.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了纸片扩散试验和琼脂筛选法检测凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(S. lugdunensis)中介导耐甲氧西林的 mecA 表型。

方法

本研究对 1998 年至 2018 年期间在香港不同来源的 179 株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌进行了研究,方法包括纸片扩散试验(头孢西丁和苯唑西林)和接种至苯唑西林(1μg/mL 和 2μg/mL)和 chromID 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)琼脂上。结果与 mecA-PCR 进行了比较。对结果不一致的分离株进一步进行 MIC 和青霉素结合蛋白 2a(PBP2a)检测。

结果

头孢西丁和苯唑西林的抑菌圈直径未以可靠的方式分布,无法区分 mecA 阳性(n=52)和 mecA 阴性(n=127)分离株。应用 2019 年临床实验室标准协会(CLSI)M100 头孢西丁纸片结果折点时,有 88%的分类一致性(CA)和 40%的重大错误(ME)。使用 2μg/mL 苯唑西林琼脂进行筛选可以可靠地区分 mecA 阳性和 mecA 阴性分离株(100%CA),没有任何主要错误(ME)或重大错误(VME)结果。使用 1μg/mL 苯唑西林琼脂或 chromID MRSA 琼脂进行筛选的性能各不相同(74-89%CA、0-38%ME 和 0-37%VME)。无法通过头孢西丁纸片检测的 mecA 阳性分离株(n=21)进一步鉴定。21 株分离株的头孢西丁 MIC 均≤4μg/mL。20 株分离株的苯唑西林 MIC 为 1-2μg/mL,1 株分离株的苯唑西林 MIC 为 4μg/mL。所有分离株均有阳性 PBP2a 结果,且均为克隆群 27/SCCmec V。

结论

这些发现强调了需要使用不同耐甲氧西林表型的 mecA 阳性凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌来评估表型方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验