Wu M T, Burnham C-A D, Westblade L F, Dien Bard J, Lawhon S D, Wallace M A, Stanley T, Burd E, Hindler J, Humphries R M
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany.
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):535-42. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02864-15. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a coagulase-positive species that colonizes the nares and anal mucosa of healthy dogs and cats. Human infections with S. pseudintermedius range in severity from bite wounds and rhinosinusitis to endocarditis; historically, these infections were thought to be uncommon, but new laboratory methods suggest that their true incidence is underreported. Oxacillin and cefoxitin disk and MIC tests were evaluated for the detection of mecA- or mecC-mediated methicillin resistance in 115 human and animal isolates of the Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG), including 111 Staphylococcus pseudintermediusand 4 Staphylococcus delphini isolates, 37 of which were mecA positive. The disk and MIC breakpoints evaluated included the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S25 Staphylococcus aureus/Staphylococcus lugdunensis oxacillin MIC breakpoints and cefoxitin disk and MIC breakpoints, the CLSI M100-S25 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) oxacillin MIC breakpoint and cefoxitin disk breakpoint, the CLSI VET01-S2 S. pseudintermedius oxacillin MIC and disk breakpoints, and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) S. pseudintermedius cefoxitin disk breakpoint. The oxacillin results interpreted by the VET01-S2 (disk and MIC) and M100-S25 CoNS (MIC) breakpoints agreed with the results of mecA/mecC PCR for all isolates, with the exception of one false-resistant result (1.3% of mecA/mecC PCR-negative isolates). In contrast, cefoxitin tests performed poorly, ranging from 3 to 89% false susceptibility (very major errors) and 0 to 48% false resistance (major errors). BD Phoenix, bioMérieux Vitek 2, and Beckman Coulter MicroScan commercial automated susceptibility test panel oxacillin MIC results were also evaluated and demonstrated >95% categorical agreement with mecA/mecC PCR results if interpreted by using the M100-S25 CoNS breakpoint. The Alere penicillin-binding protein 2a test accurately detected all mecA-positive isolates, although for four isolates, cefoxitin induction was required prior to testing. These data demonstrate that the cefoxitin surrogate test does not reliably detect the presence of mecA in S. pseudintermedius isolates and that laboratories should perform oxacillin disk or MIC tests of these isolates when they are encountered.
中间型假葡萄球菌是一种凝固酶阳性菌,可定植于健康犬猫的鼻腔和肛门黏膜。人类感染中间型假葡萄球菌的严重程度不一,从咬伤伤口、鼻窦炎到心内膜炎;从历史上看,这些感染被认为并不常见,但新的实验室方法表明其实际发病率被低估了。对115株人源和动物源中间型葡萄球菌属(SIG)菌株进行了苯唑西林和头孢西丁纸片及MIC试验,以检测mecA或mecC介导的耐甲氧西林情况,其中包括111株中间型假葡萄球菌和4株海豚葡萄球菌,其中37株mecA呈阳性。评估的纸片和MIC折点包括临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)M100-S25金黄色葡萄球菌/路邓葡萄球菌苯唑西林MIC折点以及头孢西丁纸片和MIC折点、CLSI M100-S25凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)苯唑西林MIC折点和头孢西丁纸片折点、CLSI VET01-S2中间型假葡萄球菌苯唑西林MIC和纸片折点以及欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)中间型假葡萄球菌头孢西丁纸片折点。VET01-S2(纸片和MIC)和M100-S25 CoNS(MIC)折点所解释的苯唑西林结果与所有菌株的mecA/mecC PCR结果一致,但有一个假耐药结果除外(占mecA/mecC PCR阴性菌株的1.3%)。相比之下,头孢西丁试验表现不佳,假敏感率(非常重大错误)为3%至89%,假耐药率(重大错误)为0至48%。还评估了BD Phoenix、bioMérieux Vitek 2和Beckman Coulter MicroScan商业自动化药敏试验板的苯唑西林MIC结果,结果表明,如果使用M100-S25 CoNS折点进行解释,则与mecA/mecC PCR结果的分类一致性>95%。Alere青霉素结合蛋白2a试验准确检测出所有mecA阳性菌株,不过有4株菌株在检测前需要进行头孢西丁诱导。这些数据表明,头孢西丁替代试验不能可靠地检测中间型假葡萄球菌菌株中mecA的存在,实验室在遇到这些菌株时应进行苯唑西林纸片或MIC试验。